Iris Suture Fixation vs Iris Claw for Aphakic Correction
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)
研究概览
简要总结
Evaluate and compare the advantages and disadvantages of iris suture fixation versus iris claw of posterior chamber IOLs
详细描述
The eyes were randomly divided into two groups, A and B. Group A included 25 eyes in which an iris claw lens was used; specifically, the Artisan aphakia intraocular lens (Ophtec BV, Groningen, The Netherlands), a PMMA IOL with an 8.5 mm length, 1.04 mm maximum height, and a 5.4 mm optical zone width. Group B also included 25 eyes, in which iris fixation of posterior chamber foldable IOLs was performed using a single-piece PMMA IOL. This IOL had a 6 mm optic, a total diameter of 12.75 mm, and featured one eyelet for suture fixation in each haptic. The A-constant used was 118.2.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 80 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Surgical aphakia with no capsular support, with CDVA 4/60 or better on Snellen chart including: Aphakic eyes after complicated cataract surgery, crystalline lens subluxation (Marfan syndrome, pseudoexofoliation syndrome or trauma), 2nd intervention in traumatized eyes, cases with sublaxated or dislocated IOLs.
排除标准
- •Surgical aphakia with decompensated corneas, aphakic patients with posterior segment pathologies like cystoid macular edema, choroidal neovascular membrane, aphakic patients with insufficient iris tissue, and rubeosis iridis, aphakic patients with intractable glaucoma.
结局指标
主要结局
Best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA)
时间窗: at 6 months postoperatively
BCVA in logMAR , to evaluate and compare visual recovery between the iris-claw and iris suture-fixated IOL groups.
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Ehab Mohamed Elsayed Mohamed Saad
Lecturer
Benha University