NCT02632643Unknown不适用
Assessment of the Efficacy of a Sensorimotor Approach After Maximum Three Sessions in Subjects With Symptomatic Temporomandibular Dysfunction (TMD) With Hypertonia: A Prospective, Multicenter Case Study.
适应症
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 发起方
- Osteovox
- 入组人数
- 110
- 试验地点
- 12
- 主要终点
- Overall relief (from 0% to 100%) based on the ratio of "complaint after treatment" to "complaint before treatment". Multiple measurements related to both pain and functional incapacity are aggregated to arrive at one reported value: complaint
研究概览
简要总结
The study aims to demonstrate the efficacy of the sensorimotor approach developed by A. Piron (taught to the patient in three sessions) regarding three parameters related to TMD: facial pain, functional incapacities and hypertonia.
The subjects in the study are 18 to 77 years old and present the following conditions: a TMD disorder caused or aggravated by hypertonia and responsible for cervico-maxillo-facial pain and/or a functional incapacity in the last 30 days.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 77 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •Male or female subjects aged 18 to 77 years old.
- •Subjects presenting the following 3 characteristics:
- •A TMD disorder (objectivized by the DC/TMD 2014);
- •Facial pain in the last 30 days (objectivized by the Graded Chronic Pain Scale version 2.0 (GCPS v2.0)) and/or functional incapacity (chewing, mobility, verbal and emotional communication) in the last 30 days (objectivized by the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale 20 (JFLS-20));
- •Hypertonia (objectivized by the Oral Behaviors Checklist (OBC) short version and the Explanatory Model Scale).
- •Subjects who agree to comply with the requirements of the study. Subjects who are of age (and know how to read and write) who have given their informed, explicit consent in advance to any procedure related to the trial, the study or the investigation conducted on human beings, with the objective of developing knowledge specific to the exercise of health care professions, as set out in Royal Decree No. 78 of 10 November 1967 on the practice of the health care professions (Act of 27 December 2005).
- •Subjects insured under social security.
排除标准
- •Any subject presenting at least one of the following criteria may not be included:
- •Significant medical problems involving the following conditions:
- •Severe or progressive pathology (psychiatric, neurological, cardiopulmonary, renal, hepatic, endocrinological, hematological, neoplastic, infectious, metabolic or allergic).
- •Any acute trauma of the temporomandibular joint (trauma within the last 72 hours).
- •Severe anxiety or severe depression, as defined by a score greater than or equal to 15 on the HAD.
- •Pregnant women
- •Criteria related to prior or concurrent treatments:
- •Treatment with antipsychotics, anxiolytics, soporifics or muscle relaxants started within the two months preceding the study.
- •Treatment with intraoral implants during the study or in the two months preceding the study.
- •Criteria related to lifestyle: Excessive alcohol consumption (WHO definition: more than two glasses per day for a woman and more than three for a man).
- •Subjects undergoing withdrawal or taking a replacement substance.
- •Criteria related to the subject: Subjects unlikely, in the investigator's view, to comply with the instructions in the protocol.
- •Subjects unlikely, on the basis of a score <2 to question "C" of the Explanatory Model Scale, to comply with the therapy.
- •Subjects who had participated in a clinical trial in the previous month or were participating at the time of selection.
- •Subjects without the linguistic or psychological capacity to understand and sign the informed consent form and complete the psychometric questionnaires and psychological tests.
- •Exclusion criteria after acceptance in the study:
- •In addition to becoming aware a posteriori of an error related to the inclusion or exclusion criteria defined above, the therapist may decide to remove a subject before completion of the study.
- •The motivations for early exit are as follows:
- •Subject who no longer agrees to comply with the requirements of the study.
- •Occurrence of a major life stressor (score greater than 40 on the Holmes and Rahe Stress Scale).
- •Need to redirect the subject to a different treatment. Any early exit from the study, whether decided on by the subject, the therapist or both together, will be recorded on a specific document, indicating the date and the reasons for the early exit.
结局指标
主要结局
Overall relief (from 0% to 100%) based on the ratio of "complaint after treatment" to "complaint before treatment". Multiple measurements related to both pain and functional incapacity are aggregated to arrive at one reported value: complaint
时间窗: Beginning (day 0); during treatment (day 30 and day 90); end (day 180)
Patient's complaint is calculated: * By integrating the weighting of both pain (P) and functional incapacity (FI) parameters in the complaint. 11 possibilities: \[100% P - 0% FI\] OR \[90% P - 10% FI\] OR \[80% P - 20% FI\] etc. * Patient's complaint = Pain and/or functional incapacity * Assessement of pain integrates 2 or 3 or 4 parameters: 2 are constant (intensity and frequency), 2 are optional (quality of life and drugs) because some painful patient don't take drug or don't have an altered quality of life. If there are 2 parameters, each = 50%; if 3 parameters, each = 33,3%; if 4 parameters, each = 25% * The scoring of the 4 pain parameters is based on questionnaires: Intensity: GCPS v2.0 (part 1): Score 0 to 100; Frequency (last month): Score 0 to 30; Drug: number of gram of the most specific medication (last month); Quality of life: GCPS v2.0 (part 2): score 0 to 6 * Assessement of functional incapacity integrates 1 parameter: the JFLS-20 questionnaire (score from 0 to 200)
次要结局
- Evidence of a change from baseline in the "intensity" component of cervico-maxillo-facial pain (a component of the primary outcome measure), on the basis of a questionnaire called "the Graded Chronic Pain Scale Version 2 (GCPS v2.0) (part 1)".(Beginning (day 0); during treatment (day 30 and day 90); end (day 180))
- Evidence of a change from baseline in the "impact on quality of life" component of facial pain (a component of the primary outcome measure), on the basis of questionnaire called "the Graded Chronic Pain Scale Version 2 (GCPS v2.0) (part 2)".(Beginning (day 0); during treatment (day 30 and day 90); end (day 180))
- Evidence of a change from baseline in the "frequency" component of facial pain (a component of the primary outcome measure), on the basis of a questionnaire developed by the authors.(Beginning (day 0); during treatment (day 30 and day 90); end (day 180))
- Evidence of a change from baseline in the "taking the most specific medication for painful attacks" component of facial pain (a component of the primary outcome measure), on the basis of a questionnaire developed by the authors.(Beginning (day 0); during treatment (day 30 and day 90); end (day 180))
- Evidence of a change from baseline in functional incapacity (a component of the primary outcome measure), on the basis of a questionnaire called " the Jaw Functional Limitation Scale (JFLS-20)".(Beginning (day 0); during treatment (day 30 and day 90); end (day 180))
- Evidence of a change from baseline in oral behaviors induced by hypertonia, on the basis of a questionnaire developed by the authors and called "the short version of the Oral Behavior Checklist (OBC)".(Beginning (day 0); during treatment (day 30 and day 90); end (day 180))
- Evidence of a change from baseline in dysacusis and feelings of dizziness, on the basis of a specific questionnaire developed by the authors.(Beginning (day 0) and end (day 180))
- Evidence of a change from baseline in the patient's compliance with the treatment, on the basis of a questionnaire developed by the authors.(During treatment (day 30 and day 90) and end (day 180))
- Evidence of the patient's subjective impressions of the treatment, on the basis of a questionnaire developed by the authors.(end (day 180))
- Evidence of correlations between the patient's psychological state (assessed with the HAD and SCL-90R) and the therapeutic efficacy of the approach (assessed by the patient's overall relief).(Beginning (day 0))
- Evidence of correlations between the patient's psychological state (assessed with the HAD and SCL-90R) and compliance with the treatment (assessed with a numerical scale created by the team in anticipation of the study).(Beginning (day 0))
- Evidence of the percentage of subjects diagnosed as hypertonic among all the patients diagnosed as having TMD (whether or not included in the study) by tracking the patients with a flowchart developed by the authors.(end (day 180))
研究者
研究点 (12)
Loading locations...
相似试验
尚未招募
Unknown
The effect of sensorimotor training on improving the skill and range of motion of the shoulderIRCT20200125046250N3rmia University40
进行中（未招募）
Unknown
Effectiveness of a Sensorimotor Exercise Program in the sensation of joint position, balance, muscle strength, independence to move and risk of falls in the elderlyAging HealthyMuscle StrengthPostural BalanceR54RBR-6q5299jniversidade Fernando Pessoa
Unknown
不适用
Effect of Sensory Training on Activity Limitation, Functional Use of Hand and Quality of Life After Wrist SurgeryProprioceptionNCT04187677Sanko University30
已完成
1 期
A Randomized control trial on effectiveness of sensory integration therapy on motor activity among mentally challenged childreCTRI/2018/07/014918MIMS College of Nursing
已完成
不适用
Effects of a group sensory motor approach intervention on behaviour, development and early academic skills of young children in a school setting: Results from a two-year cluster randomised controlled trialSensory motor developmentBehaviourLearningAcademic skillsPublic Health - Health promotion/educationMental Health - Studies of normal psychology, cognitive function and behaviourACTRN12616001566426Australian Catholic University600