跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06271954
NCT06271954招募中不适用

The Relationship Between Emotion Regulation and Psychiatric Disorder in Youth - From a Psychosocial Developmental Aspect.

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2023年3月27日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
发起方
入组人数
200
试验地点
1
主要终点
The Difference and Similarity in Emotional Regulation Strategy Patterns between Western and Eastern Countries.

研究概览

简要总结

According to the increasing worldwide prevalence rate of psychiatric disorders in youth, the mental health of youth is becoming more and more important.

Taiwan's Ministry of Health and Welfare reported the clibing suicide rate of youth in past five years and showed the prevention work and related intervention for youth's mental health was noteable. The definition of emotion regulation was "consists of the extrinsic and intrinsic processes responsible for monitoring, evaluating, and modifying emotional reactions, especially their intensive and temporal features, to accomplish one's goals." Emotion regulation strategies including "rumination", "avoidance", "suppression", "Problem-solving", "reappraisal", "acceptance", "social support", and "distraction".

Previous studies had examined the relationship between emotion regulation and mental health in youth; maladaptive emotion regulation would increase the individual's depressive and anxiety symptoms. Carstensen proposed social emotion theory in 1995 Selectivity theory (SST) refers to the need for emotion regulation, which activates Social participation in late adulthood. SST assumes that young people are more interested in social interaction behaviors related to information seeking and building self-concept. characteristics of youth affected by many normative challenges such as adolescence, school transitions, and more complex social Landscape; Adaptive emotion regulation will reduce risk of clinical emotion attacks of illness, especially depression and anxiety.To explore the relationship between emotion regulation and mental health from a psychosocial developmental aspect, we focused on the interaction between individual and environment. Compared with the previous generation, most youths of this generation were participating in social activities and building up interpersonal relationships through the internet, suggesting the internet was an important social context.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Case Control
时间视角
Cross Sectional

入排标准

年龄范围
15 Years 至 24 Years(Child, Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • The inclusion criteria for the control group are as follows: (1) Understanding the content of the questionnaire. (2) Healthy adolescents aged 15 to less than 18 years and healthy adults aged 18 to 24 years.
  • The inclusion criteria for the experimental group are:
  • Understanding the content of the questionnaire.
  • Adolescents aged 15 to less than 18 years and adults aged 18 to 24 years.
  • Diagnosed with major depressive disorder, anxiety disorder, attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), or adjustment disorder according to DSM-5.

排除标准

  • The exclusion criteria for the experimental group are diagnoses of:
  • organic brain injury
  • schizophrenia
  • autism spectrum disorder according to DSM-5.

结局指标

主要结局

The Difference and Similarity in Emotional Regulation Strategy Patterns between Western and Eastern Countries.

时间窗: Each respondent interviews and fills out questionnaires, which takes about 20minutes.

To examine the cultural difference in emotion regulation strategies, we applied CERQ(Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire) to measure the cognitive regulation pattern of the Taiwanese and compared it with research articles that reported the CERQ results in six European countries and China. Cognitive Emotion Regulation Questionnaire (CERQ). The CERQ includes nine positive/negative adaptive emotion regulation strategies: self-blame, rumination, Blaming others, catastrophizing, acceptance, positive refocusing, refocus on planning, positive reappraisal, putting into perspective ), each strategy subscale contains 4 questions, a total of 36 questions, and is answered in the form of a five-point scale. Subjects describe each question and circle the options that are consistent with their own situation (never, rarely, sometimes , often, always), each item ranges from 1 "never" to 5 "always", one point per question, no reverse questions.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Chang Gung Memorial Hospital
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Tzu-Yu Liu

occpatioal therapist

Chang Gung Memorial Hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验