The role of extended antral resection on weight loss and metabolic response after sleeve gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study
试验速览
- 阶段
- Unknown
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- excess weight loss
研究概览
简要总结
LSG was initially designed as the first step of a two-staged bariatric procedure. However, in the following years, LSG was found as effective as other bariatric procedures and has become increasingly popular as a stand-alone bariatric procedure [1,2]. Recently, LSG is the most performed bariatric procedure worldwide [3]. The simplicity of surgical technique, preservation of the pyloric functions, none development of marginal ulcers or internal herniation, less need of trace element and vitamin supplementation are the advantages of LSG over other bariatric procedures [4-6]. However, debate continues regarding the AR or AP on effective weight loss alterations and metabolic response. Further, the distance from pylorus at which the stomach division should be started is still not standardized and has been reported varying from 2 to 8cm [7-9]. The aim of the present retrospective cohort study was to determine whether AR is superior to AP regarding weight loss and resolution of co-morbidities.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 至 65(—)
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Patients with BMI > 40 were included.
排除标准
- •Patients with a history of previous bariatric surgery and patients who did not attend regular follow-up visits (first, 6th and 12 month) are excluded.
研究组 & 干预措施
1
2
结局指标
主要结局
excess weight loss
total body weight loss
次要结局
未报告次要终点
