跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03335449
NCT03335449已完成不适用

Effects on Respiratory Mechanics of Two Different Ventilation Strategies During Robotic-Gynecological Surgery

SPINAZZOLA GIORGIA0 个研究点目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2014年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
40
主要终点
Respiratory Compliance

研究概览

简要总结

This Randomized controlled clinical study, entitled "Effects on Respiratory mechanics of two different ventilation strategies during Robotic- Gynecological surgery", is an original paper. The study was performed in Rome, Italy, from September 2014 to September 2015.

Nowadays several studies evaluated the effects of "open lung strategy" and the positive effect of Recruitment Maneuvers and Positive End Expiratory Pressure (PEEP) application during general anesthesia, especially during open abdominal surgery and in elderly patients.

This is the first study aimed at evaluating two different ventilation strategies in healthy respiratory women undergoing Robotic surgery. In particular, the investigators evaluated the effects of protective ventilation strategy on respiratory mechanics, gas exchange and post-operative respiratory complications compared to standard ventilation.

详细描述

The ventilation protocol consisted in volume-controlled mechanical ventilation through Ventilator, inspiratory to expiratory ratio of 1:2, and a respiratory rate adjusted to normocapnia (end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure between 30 and 40 mmHg). The were randomly assigned to Standard (SV) or Protective (PV) group.

participants in the SV group received a Tidal Volume (Vt) of 10 ml/kg of Ideal Body Weight (IBW) and a PEEP of 5 cmH2O, the participants in the PV group a Vt of 6 ml/kg of IBW and a PEEP of 8-10 cmH2O, associated to recruitment maneuvers (RMs).

RMs were performed only in hemodynamic stable conditions and at pre-set moments: after the induction of anesthesia, after any disconnection from the mechanical ventilator, each hour during the surgical procedures and immediately before extubation. RMs were performed in Pressure Control mode as follows: the limit of peak inspiratory pressure was set at 45 cmH2O and the pressure control was set at 30 cmH2O, therefore three consecutive thirty seconds lasting inspiratory pauses were performed. At the end of RMs, respiratory rate, inspiratory to expiratory ratio, inspiratory pause, and Vt were set back at values preceding the RMs.

Air Flow (V') was measured with a heated pneumotachograph, inserted between the Y-piece of the ventilator circuit and the endotracheal tube. The pneumotachograph was linear over the experimental range of flow. Volume was obtained by numerical integration of the flow signal. Airway pressure (Paw) was measured proximal to the endotracheal tube with a pressure transducer with a differential pressure of ± 100 cm H2O. The end-inspiratory and end-expiratory occlusions were performed through specific maneuver of ventilator.

Following end-inspiratory occlusion there is an immediate drop of the airway pressure from a maximal value (Pmax) to airway pressure at zero flow (P1), followed by a further decrease to plateau pressure (P2). The plateau pressure usually arrived within 3 seconds. Therefore, airway pressure 3 seconds after occlusion was taken as the static end-inspiratory elastic recoil pressure (P2) of the respiratory system. The use of the interrupter method for the measurement of respiratory mechanics allows possible quantification of the airway and viscoelastic properties of the respiratory system. The difference between Pmax and P1 divided by flow provides major information about minimal airway resistance (Rmin), while the difference between P1 and P2 (ΔP) divided by flow stands for viscoelastic resistance or Pendelluft effect of the respiratory system (ΔR). Maximal respiratory resistance (Rmax) is the sum of Rmin and ΔR. The inspiratory volume divided by P2- Total PEEP yields respiratory system compliance. Mechanical respiratory measurements and arterial blood gases were performed immediately after intubation, after pneumoperitoneum (AP), every hour during the procedure and before extubation (Ext). A further arterial blood gas sample was analyzed 1 hour after extubation.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Single (Care Provider)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
Female
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Gynecological cancer elegible for laparoscopic surgery

排除标准

  • •Respiratory disease

研究组 & 干预措施

Protective ventilation group

Experimental

Protective ventilation (PV group) (Vt 6 ml/Kg of ideal body weight, PEEP 8-10 cmH 2 O and repeated recruitment maneuvers.

干预措施: Protective ventilation group (Other)

Standard ventilation group

No Intervention

Standard ventilation (SV group) (Tidal Volume, Vt 10 ml/Kg of ideal body weight, Positive End Expiratory Pressure, PEEP 5 cmH 2 O, no recruitment maneuvers)

结局指标

主要结局

Respiratory Compliance

时间窗: One year

inspiratory Volume/Plateau Pressure-PEEP (ml/cmH2O)

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
SPINAZZOLA GIORGIA
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor Investigator
主要研究者

SPINAZZOLA GIORGIA

Physician, specialist in Anesthesia and Intensive Care Medicine

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

相似试验