The Effect of Deliberate Practice Training of Graduate Students in General Psychotherapeutic Skills Compared to Theoretical Teaching: the Randomized Controlled TRIPS Trial
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 招募中
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 198
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Change in Facilitative Interpersonal Skills - Observer (FIS; Anderson & Patterson, 2013)
研究概览
简要总结
In this study, a deliberate practice-based approach to therapist training will be compared to theoretical teaching. The main hypothesis is that deliberate practice training will result in a larger improvement in students' observer-rated interpersonal skills. About 200 graduate students from two Danish universities will be randomized into two groups, a) deliberate practice training of non-specific psychotherapeutic skills using role-play and Theravue, an online skill-building system with therapy videos; or b) theoretical teaching. Each condition consists of 15 hours of classroom participation and homework. The study has the potential to transform the training of psychotherapy skills.
详细描述
Background: Psychology students at universities in Denmark and worldwide only receive little clinical training, even though such training is crucial to psychologists' job performance after graduation. Training non-specific psychotherapeutic skills, such as being empathic and facilitating the therapeutic alliance, is critical since these skills are related to psychotherapy outcomes. In this study, a deliberate practice approach to training will be compared to theoretical teaching.
Hypothesis: The first and main hypothesis is that the students' observer-rated Facilitative Interpersonal Skills (FIS) will improve significantly more after deliberate practice training compared to theoretical teaching. The second hypothesis is that students' self-reported Facilitative Interpersonal Skills (FIS-SR), self-efficacy, and empathy will increase significantly more after training compared to theoretical teaching. The third hypothesis is that students reporting higher baseline levels of self-affiliation, attachment security, external feedback propensity, and self-efficacy will have a larger increase in FIS after the training program. The fourth hypothesis is that the amount of deliberate practice will predict improvement in FIS at post-training, whereas the students' sociodemographic characteristics, previous experience with psychotherapy, and preferred psychotherapy approach will not be associated with improvement in FIS.
Methods: One hundred ninety-eight graduate students from the Universities of Copenhagen and Aalborg University will be randomized into two groups, a) deliberate practice training of non-specific skills using role-play and Theravue, or b) theoretical teaching. Group a will first receive the experimental condition (deliberate practice), followed by the control condition, while group b will receive the conditions in reverse order. Each condition consists of 15 hours of classroom participation and homework. The primary outcome is Facilitative Interpersonal Skills - Observer. Secondary outcomes include the Facilitative Interpersonal Skills-Self-Report, the Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales, and the Interpersonal Reactivity Index. Outcomes will be measured at baseline (week 0), after the first condition (week 5; before the crossover, reflecting true randomization), and after both conditions (week 10). Main outcome analyses will be performed at week 5.
To test deliberate practice as a predictor of FIS improvement, the amount of deliberate practice activity is measured on a self-report questionnaire developed for this study and tracked on Theravue as a) the total time spent on watching and responding to therapy videos and b) the average number of attempts to improve the response to each therapy video. The Structural Analysis of Social Behavior Intrex questionnaire (SASB; Benjamin, 2000), the Social Skills Inventory (SSI; Riggio, 1989), the Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (ECR; Brennan et al., 1998), and the Internal and External Feedback Propensity Scales (IEFPS; Herold et al., 1996) will be measured at week 0 and explored as possible between-condition moderators of the outcome. The Group Climate Questionnaire-Short Form (GCQ-S; MacKenzie, 1983) will be used to measure the collaboration in the student groups, where approximately five students work together throughout the study period, performing role-plays and giving peer feedback in the experimental condition, and discussing theory in the control condition. The observer-rated DP Coach Competency Scale (DPCCS; Rousmaniere, 2020) will be used to evaluate adherence and quality of the deliberate practice training. Stig Bernt Poulsen, University of Copenhagen, and Ole Karkov Østergård, Aalborg University, are co-principal investigators.
Discussion: The study can potentially transform the training of psychotherapy, not only for psychology students but also for psychologists in general. Furthermore, the results of the study can be transferred to the training of other clinical skills.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
The blinding of raters will be ensured for the primary performance-based outcome (i.e., Facilitative Interpersonal Skills) by assigning the video-recorded responses randomly to the raters and concealing the group allocation (experimental vs. control) and time of measurement (week 0, 5, or 10). Furthermore, analyses of outcomes and the conclusion regarding hypotheses 1 and 2 will be performed blinded to allocation (i.e., results in favor of condition X or Y).
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Graduate psychology students attending a 30-hour elective course in clinical psychology called "Deliberate practice training of general psychotherapeutic skills" at two universities in Denmark (i.e., Department of Communication and Psychology at Aalborg University and the Department of Psychology at the University of Copenhagen).
- •All participants hold a Bachelor of Science in psychology.
- •Signed informed consent.
排除标准
- •Course participants who are declining to participate in the study.
结局指标
主要结局
Change in Facilitative Interpersonal Skills - Observer (FIS; Anderson & Patterson, 2013)
时间窗: Three different sets, each consisting of three FIS videos, will be presented to each student three times in randomized order: at baseline (week 0), after the first condition (week 5), and after the second condition (week 10)
FIS measures relationship skills exhibited in psychotherapy. The therapists are asked to respond as helpfully as possible to video clips simulating challenging therapy situations. FIS has eight dimensions: (1) verbal fluency; (2) hope and positive expectations; (3) persuasiveness; (4) emotional expression; (5) warmth, acceptance, and understanding; (6) empathy; (7) alliance-bond capacity; and (8) alliance rupture-repair responsiveness. The items are rated on a 5-point Likert scale from 1 = skill deficit to 5 = optimal presence of skill.
次要结局
- Change in Interpersonal Reactivity Index (IRI; Davis, 1983).(Week 0, week 5, and week 10)
- Change in Facilitative Interpersonal Skills-Self-Report (FIS-SR, Anderson, et al., 2020)(Immediately after replying to the FIS videos at week 0, week 5, and week 10)
- Change in Counselor Activity Self-Efficacy Scales (CASES; Lent et al., 2003)(Week 0, week 5, and week 10)
研究者
Ole Karkov Østergård
Assistant Professor, PhD
Aalborg University
