Comparison of Intubation Through the McGrath® MAC, GlideScope®, AirTraq® and Miller Laryngoscope by Paramedics During Pediatric Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: a Randomized Crossover Manikin Trial.
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 100
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Time to intubation
研究概览
简要总结
Endotracheal intubation (ETI) is perceived as the optimal method of providing and maintaining a clear and secure airway. The 2010 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines emphasized the importance of minimal interruption during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR). These guidelines also suggest that skilled operators should be able to secure the airway without interrupting chest compression. The aim of the study was to compare time and success rates of different available video laryngoscopes and the Miller laryngoscope for emergency intubation during simulated pediatric CPR.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •give voluntary consent to participate in the study
- •paramedics, nurses, physicians
排除标准
- •not meet the above criteria
- •wrist or low back diseases
结局指标
主要结局
Time to intubation
时间窗: intraoperative
time from insertion of the blade to the first manual ventilation of the manikin´s lungs. If time of intubation is over than 60 seconds, attempt was recognized as failure.
次要结局
- Success of intubation(intraoperative)
- Visual Analog scale (VAS) score(1 day)
研究者
Lukasz Szarpak
Lukasz Szarpak
National Institute of Cardiology, Warsaw, Poland