跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04153461
NCT04153461Unknown不适用

Mini- Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy Versus Standard Percutaneous Nephrolithotomy in the Treatment of Renal Stones. A Randomized Controlled Trial

Mansoura University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 210 人开始时间: 2019年5月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
210
试验地点
2
主要终点
Assessment of stone free rate (SFR)

研究概览

简要总结

The EUA Urolithiasis Guidelines Panel meta-analysis suggest that mPNL is at least as efficacious and safe as sPNL for the removal of renal calculi. However, the quality of the evidence was poor, drawn mainly from small studies, the majority of which were single-arm case series, and only one of which was RCT. The risks of bias and confounding were high, highlighting the need for more reliable data from RCTs. So, the Panel recommended for more clinical research .

The aim of this study is to compare between PNL and mPNL through a randomized controlled trial.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patient 18 years or older.
  • ASA I or II
  • Renal stones ≥ 2 cm
  • Lower calyceal stone ≥ 1 cm
  • Failure of other modalities of treatment as ESWL and RIRS.

排除标准

  • S.creatinine > 2mg/dl.
  • Patients with active UTI.
  • Patients on anticoagulant.
  • Age <18 years.
  • Ureteral obstruction preventing the insertion of a ureteral stent.

结局指标

主要结局

Assessment of stone free rate (SFR)

时间窗: 2 years

defined as less than 4mm by non contrast computed tomography

次要结局

  • assessment of renal function(2 years)
  • assessment of pain(2 years)
  • assessment of patient satisfaction(2 years)
  • assessment of haemoglobin loss(2 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Mostafa Elgamal

Principal Investigator

Mansoura University

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验