Comparison of the Difference in Bone Age Readings Among Radiologists Using Artificial Intelligence
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- Enrolling By Invitation
- 入组人数
- 8
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Difference of Skeletal Age Estimate
研究概览
简要总结
AI-Assisted Bone Age Assessment
详细描述
Artificial intelligence (AI) has gained great advancement in the application in clinical practice. However, this might introduce the automation bias, that the clinician over-rely on the incorrect advise from AI. The automation bias could have a great impact on the clinical decisions in an AI era. However, efforts to mitigate the automation bias tend to focus on upgrading AI performance and reducing bias in algorithms, which neglect the role of users. The aim of this study is to investigates the impact of the automation bias on the bone age assessment among radiologists with different seniority.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Crossover
- 主要目的
- Diagnostic
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Exams read by radiologists who interpret pediatric skeletal age exams and verbally consent to participate
排除标准
- •Exams containing more than one radiograph will not be included. No further exclusion criteria will be applied on the basis of image quality metrics or manufacturers
研究组 & 干预措施
True AI
干预措施: True AI (Device)
Fake AI
干预措施: Fake AI (Device)
结局指标
主要结局
Difference of Skeletal Age Estimate
时间窗: Five months
Mean absolute difference of bone age assessment between true AI-assisted and fake AI-assisted among radiologists
次要结局
未报告次要终点