A Randomized Controlled Evaluation a Training Intervention to Increase the Use of Statistical Process Control Charts for National Health Service Hospitals in England
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 15
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Change in the proportion of SPC charts out of all quality and safety charts from baseline to five months post intervention
研究概览
简要总结
Hospitals collect copious amounts of data to share with their board for quality assurance and improvement purposes. The way these data are presented can influence board members' decisions. For example, time-series charts highlight the highest and lowest data but do not clarify whether those data lie outside expected or 'common cause' variation. Statistical process control charts make this clarification and, in so doing, guide quality assurance and improvements in a more targeted fashion.
A previous study showed that data suitable for presentation as a control chart are seldom presented in that format. A training intervention called 'Making Data Count' was created to improve the uptake of statistical process control charts by hospitals in England. The current study will use a randomized design to evaluate whether the intervention increases control charts in hospitals that were not early adopters of the training intervention.
This study is a parallel cluster randomized trial (with baseline-line measurements) across 20 National Health Service (NHS) hospitals in England. The hospitals will be randomly split into two groups. One group will be scheduled to experience the training intervention, and the other group will be placed on a waiting list to experience the training later. The primary analysis will compare the difference in the use of control charts between waitlist and intervention hospitals (adjusting for pre-intervention use) reported with 95% confidence intervals. A qualitative thematic analysis of feedback forms will be conducted.
The present research will evaluate the impact of the training intervention on the use of control charts. The results will apply to institutions that are not early adopters of this training intervention.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Health Services Research
- 盲法
- None
盲法说明
Participants cannot be blinded as this is a behavioural intervention.
Some of the researchers can be blinded. Specifically, it is not possible to blind reviewers R1 and R2 to the board papers group or time-period, as those researchers are extracting charts from the published board papers. R3 and R4 will be blinded and will be instructed to inform R1 if those researchers are unblinded at any point, and whether/how often those researchers are unblinded will be reported in the final manuscript.
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •NHS Hospital
- •Placed on a red-list for predominantly using R-A-G or two-point data presentations in their board papers.
排除标准
- 未提供
结局指标
主要结局
Change in the proportion of SPC charts out of all quality and safety charts from baseline to five months post intervention
时间窗: One month pre-intervention and then five months post-intervention.
Change in the proportion of SPC charts (the numerator) out of all charts indicated in each board paper (the denominator)
次要结局
- SPC elements(One month pre-intervention and then five months post-intervention.)
- Chart types(One month pre-intervention and then five months post-intervention.)
- SPC supporting text(One month pre-intervention and then five months post-intervention.)
研究者
Kelly Ann Schmidtke
Assistant Professor
University of Warwick
