跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00604747
NCT00604747已完成不适用

The Effects of Practice Structure on Motor Learning in Post-Stroke Patients

University of Sao Paulo1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 34 人开始时间: 2006年8月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
34
试验地点
1
主要终点
change in performance during the acquisition; performance exhibited during the transfer phase was maintained during retention phases 1 and 2; and differences between the groups during the transfer phase and retention phases

研究概览

简要总结

Background: The literature indicates that, in relation to motor learning, healthy subjects benefit more from random practice than from constant practice. However, this effect is not well known in post-stroke patients. Objective: The goal of this study was to investigate the effects of practice structure on motor learning in post-stroke patients. Methods: Participants included an experimental group (EG) of post-stroke patients: 17 males and females; and a control group (CG) of healthy individuals: 17 males and females. At the acquisition phase, all participants performed 30 trials of a coincident timing task. Nine individuals from each group practiced constantly (C) at a stimulus propagation speed of 3 mph, and eight from each group practiced randomly (R) at speeds of 2, 3, and 5 mph. Subsequent phases included: 1) transfer, 2) retention after 15 minutes, and 3) retention after 3 days. Each of these phases included 20 trials: 10 at a speed of 1 mph, and 10 at a speed of 4 mph. Intra- and inter-group comparisons were made employing an alpha level of 0.05 (5%).

详细描述

Utilized was Bassin's anticipation timer (Lafayette Instruments #50575), which is comprised of a control screen, one 1.52 m gutter with 32 diodes placed on it linearly, and a response button. The screen has a digital display, with commands that permit the operator to control the stimulus propagation speed and the preparatory interval speed. Once activated, the screen exhibits an alert signal, and, after the preparatory interval, it initiates the propagation of a luminous stimulus, lighting the 32 diodes successively. The task required participants to press the response button simultaneously with the illumination of the last diode. The digital display showed the error measure (em): that is, the difference between the illumination of the last diode and the response.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
40 Years 至 62 Years(Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
是

入选标准

  • •First cerebrovascular accident
  • •Lesion covering the middle and the anterior cerebral artery territories
  • •Presence of hemiplegia or hemiparesis
  • •Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) score above 24 (19)
  • •Sufficient attention and comprehension to perform the task
  • •Absence of other associated neurological diseases.

排除标准

  • •Acute medical problems
  • •Uncorrected vision loss
  • •Previous history of psychiatric admission
  • •History of multiple strokes, transient ischemic attacks
  • •Pathology of the less affected, ipsilateral to stroke upper extremity that would affect ability to perform the task
  • •Score of 23 or less on the MMSE
  • •Difficulty in comprehension of verbal command and simple instructions
  • •Aphasia of comprehension.

研究组 & 干预措施

1, 2

Other

干预措施: Structure practice (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

change in performance during the acquisition; performance exhibited during the transfer phase was maintained during retention phases 1 and 2; and differences between the groups during the transfer phase and retention phases

时间窗: time in miliseconds

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验