跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03686735
NCT03686735已完成不适用

How to Measure Patient Satisfaction

University of Texas at Austin6 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 256 人开始时间: 2018年6月22日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
256
试验地点
6
主要终点
Patient satisfaction scale 2

研究概览

简要总结

This study aims to assess differences between 4 types of single satisfaction measures. Secondly, if there is a difference in satisfaction between English speaking and Spanish speaking patients.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Prospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 89 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Patient satisfaction scale 2

时间窗: Immediately after the visit. Through study completion, approximately 6 months.

How helpful was this visit? Scale 2 has 5 anchors and no numbers visible for the participant Scored from 0-10: 0 This visit was not helpful at all There were many ways it could have been better Neither useless nor helpful visit Exceptionally helpful visit 10 One of the most helpful doctor visits I have ever had Higher scores indicate more satisfaction

Patient satisfaction scale 1

时间窗: Immediately after the visit. Through study completion, approximately 6 months.

How helpful was this visit? Scale 1 has 5 anchors and numbers Scored from 0-10: 0 This visit was not helpful at all 1 2-3 There were many ways it could have been better 4 5 Neither useless nor helpful visit 6 7-8 Exceptionally helpful visit 9 10 One of the most helpful doctor visits I have ever had Higher scores indicate more satisfaction

Patient satisfaction scale 3

时间窗: Immediately after the visit. Through study completion, approximately 6 months.

How helpful was this visit? Scale 3 is a visual analog scale with 3 anchors and numbers Scored from 0-100: 0 Least helpful visit 50 neutral 100 Most helpful visit Higher scores indicate more satisfaction

Patient satisfaction scale 4

时间窗: Immediately after the visit. Through study completion, approximately 6 months.

How helpful was this visit? Scale 4 is a visual analog scale with 3 anchors and no numbers visible for the participant Scored from 0-100: 0 This visit was not helpful at all 50 Neither useless nor helpful visit 100 One of the most helpful doctor visits I have ever had Higher scores indicate more satisfaction

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

David Ring

Associate Dean for Comprehensive Care. Professor of Surgery and Psychiatry

University of Texas at Austin

研究点 (6)

Loading locations...

相似试验