跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02168257
NCT02168257终止不适用

Neotech RAM Cannula Versus Conventional Binasal Prong Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) to Treat Respiratory Distress in Low Birth Weight Neonates

Children's Hospitals and Clinics of Minnesota2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 8 人开始时间: 2014年6月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
8
试验地点
2
主要终点
Oxygenation

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine if the RAM cannula is as effective as conventional binasal prongs to deliver CPAP to low birth weight infants with respiratory distress.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Low Birth Weight Infant
  • Currently on continuous positive aireway pressure of 5-7 cm water pressure
  • Receiving continuous positive airway pressure support for > 24 hrs prior to enrollment
  • Fraction of inspired oxygen requirement of 23-50%

排除标准

  • Fraction of inspired oxygen > 50%
  • Congenital defects of head, pulmonary or cardiovascular systems
  • Chromosomal abnormalities/genetic syndromes
  • Invasive Surgical Procedure within 24 hrs prior to enrollment
  • Enrollment in separate clinical trial that has ongoing data collection

研究组 & 干预措施

RAM Cannula CPAP

Experimental

CPAP provided by RAM Cannula

干预措施: RAM Cannula (Device)

Binasal Prong CPAP

Active Comparator

CPAP provided by binasal prong

干预措施: Binasal Prong CPAP (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Oxygenation

时间窗: 3 hrs

Pulse oximetry

Ventilation

时间窗: 3 hrs

transcutaneous carbon dioxide monitor

次要结局

  • Esophageal pressure measurements(3 hrs)
  • Apnea(3 hrs)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Neotech RAM Cannula Versus Conventional Binasal... | 临床试验