Comparison of Ram cannula and short binasal prongs in delivering CPAP
Not Applicable
- Conditions
- Health Condition 1: J988- Other specified respiratory disorders
- Registration Number
- CTRI/2023/05/052972
- Lead Sponsor
- Richa Singh Rajawat
- Brief Summary
Not available
- Detailed Description
Not available
Recruitment & Eligibility
- Status
- ot Yet Recruiting
- Sex
- Not specified
- Target Recruitment
- 0
Inclusion Criteria
Any neonate 28-<=35 weeks gestation requiring NICU admission for respiratory distress within 6 hours of life (28-<=32 weeks & 32-<=35weeks), Fio2 requirement <40%
Exclusion Criteria
Major congenital malformation
Birth asphyxi
Encephalopathy
Shock
Need for intubation in first 6 hours of life
Poor spontaneous respiratory efforts
Denial of consent
Study & Design
- Study Type
- Interventional
- Study Design
- Not specified
- Primary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method To compare the efficacy in Ram cannula and short binasal prongs group by assessing duration of CPAP in preterm neonates (28-â?¤35 weeks) with respiratory distress managed on bubble CPAP as primary respiratory support targeting the mean delivered oropharyngeal pressures.Timepoint: Mean oropharyngeal pressures will be measured at 0, 12, 24 hours of starting CPAP support
- Secondary Outcome Measures
Name Time Method 1.CPAP failure (Need for change of interface / escalation of respiratory support within 72 hours of randomization) <br/ ><br>2.Nasal trauma <br/ ><br>3.All-cause mortality till discharge <br/ ><br>4.Surfactant requirement <br/ ><br>5.Air leaks <br/ ><br>6.NEC <br/ ><br>7.ROP requiring treatment <br/ ><br>8.Duration of NICU stay <br/ ><br>9.Duration of hospital stay <br/ ><br>Timepoint: At end of 72 hours