跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03252210
NCT03252210Unknown不适用

Preoperative Stereoscopic Localization Versus Methylene Blue Localization in GGO Patients With Lung Wedge Resection:A Prospective Self-control Study.

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital0 个研究点目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2017年8月16日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
20
主要终点
success rate of Stereoscopic Localization

研究概览

简要总结

This study evaluates the feasibility,accuracy and safety of Preoperative Stereoscopic Localization Versus Methylene Blue Localization in GGO Wedge Resection. In the first stage,participants will receive both Preoperative Stereoscopic Localization and Methylene Blue Localization .In the second stage,participants only receive Preoperative Stereoscopic Localization for Wedge Resection.

详细描述

More and more Ground Glass Opacity(GGO)are detected because of the early screening.According to Fleischner Society, for some solid GGO, surgical resection should be performed if the solid component is larger than 5mm.With the development of video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS) techniques, minimally invasive thoracic surgery has evolved considerably over the last three decades.However, localizing the small sized pulmonary nodules during VATS is challenging when there is no change in visceral pleura.

Several traditional techniques have been described to localize peripheral pulmonary nodules, including preoperative CT-guided tattooing with methylene blue, CT scan guided spiral/hook wire placement and marking with radio-opaque materials. The traditional marking method have its strong and weak points. For the strong point, It provide a credible and precise nodule location to the surgeon. For the weak points:(1)a potential risk of pneumothorax and hemothorax.(2)Methylene blue have a tendency to diffuse over a large area during surgical preparation until the nodule's location is confirmed.(3)The Preoperative localization technique would need more time for the Preoperative preparation, which would be reduce the transport's efficiency.(4)It would occupy the resource of CT's usage.(5)Some of the methods ,such as methylene blue, maybe interference with the Pathological diagnosis.(6)These methods are all invasive operation, would Cause the patients' psychological fear.

In order to avoid these weak points,the investigators use a new localization technique which has three basic steps: 1.Confirm the nodule's location in pulmonary segments. 2.Measure the distance between the nodule and anatomic landmarks on CT. 3. Estimate the changes of the distance between the nodule and anatomic landmarks after the alveolar atelectasis. The investigators have already succeed in some case.But,the further study is needed.Hence,the investigators designed a prospective study of Preoperative Stereoscopic Localization Versus Methylene Blue Localization in GGO Wedge Resection.Then,the investigators evaluate the feasibility,accuracy and safety of Preoperative Stereoscopic Localization Versus Methylene Blue Localization in GGO Wedge Resection.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

盲法说明

Eventhough only one group of participants,different investigators perform two kinds of localization techniques.

入排标准

年龄范围
16 Years 至 80 Years(Child, Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Preoperative radiology revealed the solid component of GGO is larger than 5mm
  • Preoperative radiology revealed peripheral pulmonary nodule, with both size and depth less than 3 cm
  • Preoperative radiology revealed the distance from the lesion to the visceral pleura is larger than 5 mm

排除标准

  • Preoperative radiology revealed pneumonia or atelectasis
  • Any unstable systemic disease (including active infection, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable angina, congestive heart failure, myocardial infarction within the previous year, serious cardiac arrhythmia requiring medication, hepatic, renal, or metabolic disease).
  • Bleeding tendency or anticoagulant use
  • Pregnancy or breast feeding
  • Patient who can not sign permit

研究组 & 干预措施

Stereoscopic Versus Methylene Blue

Experimental

In the same participant,we perform both Stereoscopic and Methylene Blue localization。Then,compare the distance between the methylene blue's anchor point and the location of lesion,stereoscopic Localization's anchor point and the location of lesion,methylene blue's anchor point and stereoscopic Localization's anchor point.

Post Hoc Multiple Comparisons

干预措施: Preoperative Stereoscopic Localization (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

success rate of Stereoscopic Localization

时间窗: 3 day

Success localization means that the distance from lession to anchor point is less than 3.0 cm.

次要结局

  • Comparison between Stereoscopic Localization success rate and Methylene Blue Localization success rate(3 day)
  • Distance from A to B(3 day)
  • Distance from A to C(3 day)
  • Distance from B to C(3 day)
  • The success rate of wedge resection(3 day)
  • Postoperative adverse event incidence rate(1 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Wen-zhao ZHONG

Deputy director of Guangdong lung cancer institute

Guangdong Provincial People's Hospital

相似试验