跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT01336075
NCT01336075终止不适用

Atrial Fibrillation: Ablation or Surgical Treatment II: FAST II A Randomized Study Comparing Non-pharmacologic Therapy in Patients With Drug-refractory Atrial Fibrillation Referred for a First Time Invasive Treatment.

Aalborg University Hospital6 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 26 人开始时间: 2011年4月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
26
试验地点
6
主要终点
Freedom from atrial fibrillation with or without antiarrhythmic drug.

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to compare two invasive treatments of symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: Percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation and mini invasive thoracoscopic radiofrequency ablation in patients referred for a first time invasive treatment for atrial fibrillation.

The hypothesis is, that mini invasive thoracoscopic radiofrequency ablation as a first time invasive treatment is more effective compared to a percutaneous catheter based technique in patients with symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation refractory or intolerant to at least one antiarrhythmic drug.

详细描述

Atrial fibrillation is characterized by disorganized, rapid, and irregular contraction of the atria. Its effects on hemodynamic and thromboembolic events result in significant morbidity, mortality, impaired quality of life, hospitalizations, and health-cost.

It is the most common sustained cardiac arrhythmia. Over six million Europeans suffer from this arrhythmia. The prevalence is estimated to at least double in the next 50 years and is probably underestimated due to asymptomatic atrial fibrillation. The prevalence increases with age and affects men more often.

Atrial fibrillation is treated medically with varying results and there are no definitive long term curative treatments. The main goal aims at reducing symptoms and preventing disabling complications. Treatment normally includes antithrombotic, rhythm, and/or rate management, New non-pharmacological interventions have evolved over the last decades in order to prevent paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and/or reduce symptoms. The main focus of non-pharmacological intervention has been on percutaneous radiofrequency catheter ablation and surgical maze ablation. Both approaches aim at minimizing the impact of "triggers" from the pulmonary veins by electrical isolation of the veins.

Studies comparing antiarrhythmic drug and radiofrequency ablation indicate that radiofrequency ablation has a higher efficacy rate, a lower rate of complications, and in selected patients radiofrequency ablation reduced the risk of atrial fibrillation recurrence after one year by 65 % compared with antiarrhythmic drug. In a recently published paper the success rate after a mean of 1.3 radiofrequency ablation procedures per patient varied from 57.7% to 75.4% with higher success rates in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation as compared to persistent/permanent atrial fibrillation.

European Society of Cardiology recommends that radiofrequency ablation is reserved for patients who remain symptomatic despite optimal therapy and failed at least one antiarrhythmic drug.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Recurrent symptomatic paroxysmal atrial fibrillation
  • Previously failed one or more antiarrhythmic or beta-blocker medication (treatment > 30 days) or if any contraindications against treatment with these drug.
  • Patient is willing and able to attend the scheduled follow-up visits
  • Signed informed consent

排除标准

  • Persistent or permanent atrial fibrillation
  • Previously atrial fibrillation ablation procedure
  • Atrial fibrillation secondary to electrolyte imbalance, thyroid disease, or reversible or non-cardiac cause
  • Severe underlying heart disease (congenital heart disease, significant valvular disease, cardiomyopathy with LVEF < 35 %, angina pectoris/ ischemic heart disease).
  • Severe enlargement of left atrium (> 45mm)
  • Patient with pacemaker
  • Failure to obtain informed consent
  • Pregnant or breastfeeding women.
  • Patient unable to undergo TEE or with documented left atrial thrombus
  • Patients with co-morbid conditions who, in the opinion of the investigator, constitute increased risk of general anesthesia or port access, e.g. pleural fibrosis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (FEV1 < 1.5 L/s).
  • Known internal carotid artery stenosis (> 80 %).
  • Patients, who are enrolled in another clinical trial
  • Life expectancy less than one year
  • Previously TIA/stroke

结局指标

主要结局

Freedom from atrial fibrillation with or without antiarrhythmic drug.

时间窗: 12 month follow-up

Determined by seven days Holter monitoring, ECG, and patient interviews. An episode of atrial fibrillation/flutter/tachycardia is defined as more than 30 seconds of atrial fibrillation observed on Holter monitoring/telemetry or ECG

次要结局

  • Procedural complications(12 month follow-up)
  • Quality of life(12 month follow-up)
  • Health economics (cost-effectiveness analysis)(12 month follow-up)
  • Reduction in atrial fibrillation burden(12 month follow-up)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Henrik Vadmann, MD, Ph.d student.

MD, Ph.D. student

Aalborg University Hospital

研究点 (6)

Loading locations...

相似试验