Simulating Psychotherapeutic Sessions With Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Proof-of-Concept Study of In Silico Psychotherapy Research
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 520
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Simulation's Accuracy in generating Psychotherapeutic Dialogues
研究概览
简要总结
The study assesses the potential of using computational models, specifically large language models, to simulate psychotherapeutic sessions, aiming to improve therapy outcomes and advance therapist training through innovative technology.
详细描述
Health research has evolved significantly, increasingly incorporating computational models that improve our understanding and effectiveness of medical interventions. This shift from traditional to computational methods represents a major advancement in medical research, offering a more sustainable and innovative approach for conceptual advances and therapeutic discovery. In silico models, based on scientific simulation, use computational algorithms to mimic real-world systems or processes. This virtual environment allows researchers to explore phenomena impractical, unethical, dangerous, expensive, or impossible to study otherwise.
Psychotherapy is widely acknowledged as a primary treatment for a variety of mental health conditions, from depression and anxiety to personality disorders, offering significant pathways to recovery and improved quality of life. Yet current methods have shown limited effectiveness, prompting a need for innovative research approaches. In silico psychotherapy research leverages computational simulations, large language models (LLMs), and generative artificial intelligence to explore and refine psychotherapeutic interventions. By simulating human-like conversations, this approach provides insights into therapy dynamics and holds promise for revolutionizing therapist training and expanding treatment techniques.
This study aims to establish a proof-of-concept for simulating psychotherapeutic sessions using LLMs, focusing specifically on motivational interviewing. It involves the simulation of 512 psychotherapy sessions using LLMs as well as 8 real-world psychotherapy transcripts. By modeling human interactions, the study seeks to enhance healthcare delivery, therapist training, and personalized psychotherapy.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Non Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Other
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Simulation of psychotherapy sessions of conversations between an adult person presenting with a mental or behavioral health problem and a psychotherapist using large language models and 8 real-world transcripts
排除标准
- •Simulation protocols with severe simulation errors
研究组 & 干预措施
High Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors
In this group, the patient-large language model (LLM) interacted with a therapist-LLM prompted to exhibit high levels of positive common factors.
干预措施: High Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors (Behavioral)
Low Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors
In this group, the patient-large language model (LLM) interacted with a therapist-LLM prompted to exhibit low levels of positive common factors.
干预措施: Low Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors (Behavioral)
Transcripts of real intervention sessions
This group consists of published transcripts of real intervention sessions, in which motivational interview techniques have been applied.
干预措施: Standard motivational interviewing (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Simulation's Accuracy in generating Psychotherapeutic Dialogues
时间窗: 12 months
Assessment of the simulation's ability to accurately produce psychotherapeutic dialogues that adhere to the principles and techniques of motivational interviewing (MI), as determined by the average global scores of the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) code 4.2. The MITI code 4.2 includes various subscales, such as empathy and MI spirit, each scored on a scale from 1 to 5, with lower scores suggesting a need for improvement in MI delivery, while higher scores reflect stronger therapeutic skills and better patient outcomes.
次要结局
- Turn-takings(12 months)
- Improvement of Patient(12 months)
- Metric of Verbal Content (Patient)(12 months)
- Number of Errors/Deviations(12 months)
- Metric of Verbal Content (Therapist)(12 months)
- Credibility of Patient Behavior(12 months)
- Credibility of Therapist Behavior(12 months)
- Manipulation Check(12 months)
