跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06813066
NCT06813066已完成不适用

Simulating Psychotherapeutic Sessions With Generative Artificial Intelligence: A Proof-of-Concept Study of In Silico Psychotherapy Research

University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 520 人开始时间: 2025年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
520
试验地点
2
主要终点
Simulation's Accuracy in generating Psychotherapeutic Dialogues

研究概览

简要总结

The study assesses the potential of using computational models, specifically large language models, to simulate psychotherapeutic sessions, aiming to improve therapy outcomes and advance therapist training through innovative technology.

详细描述

Health research has evolved significantly, increasingly incorporating computational models that improve our understanding and effectiveness of medical interventions. This shift from traditional to computational methods represents a major advancement in medical research, offering a more sustainable and innovative approach for conceptual advances and therapeutic discovery. In silico models, based on scientific simulation, use computational algorithms to mimic real-world systems or processes. This virtual environment allows researchers to explore phenomena impractical, unethical, dangerous, expensive, or impossible to study otherwise.

Psychotherapy is widely acknowledged as a primary treatment for a variety of mental health conditions, from depression and anxiety to personality disorders, offering significant pathways to recovery and improved quality of life. Yet current methods have shown limited effectiveness, prompting a need for innovative research approaches. In silico psychotherapy research leverages computational simulations, large language models (LLMs), and generative artificial intelligence to explore and refine psychotherapeutic interventions. By simulating human-like conversations, this approach provides insights into therapy dynamics and holds promise for revolutionizing therapist training and expanding treatment techniques.

This study aims to establish a proof-of-concept for simulating psychotherapeutic sessions using LLMs, focusing specifically on motivational interviewing. It involves the simulation of 512 psychotherapy sessions using LLMs as well as 8 real-world psychotherapy transcripts. By modeling human interactions, the study seeks to enhance healthcare delivery, therapist training, and personalized psychotherapy.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Non Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Single (Participant)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Simulation of psychotherapy sessions of conversations between an adult person presenting with a mental or behavioral health problem and a psychotherapist using large language models and 8 real-world transcripts

排除标准

  • Simulation protocols with severe simulation errors

研究组 & 干预措施

High Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors

Experimental

In this group, the patient-large language model (LLM) interacted with a therapist-LLM prompted to exhibit high levels of positive common factors.

干预措施: High Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors (Behavioral)

Low Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors

Experimental

In this group, the patient-large language model (LLM) interacted with a therapist-LLM prompted to exhibit low levels of positive common factors.

干预措施: Low Levels of Common Therapeutic Factors (Behavioral)

Transcripts of real intervention sessions

Other

This group consists of published transcripts of real intervention sessions, in which motivational interview techniques have been applied.

干预措施: Standard motivational interviewing (Behavioral)

结局指标

主要结局

Simulation's Accuracy in generating Psychotherapeutic Dialogues

时间窗: 12 months

Assessment of the simulation's ability to accurately produce psychotherapeutic dialogues that adhere to the principles and techniques of motivational interviewing (MI), as determined by the average global scores of the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) code 4.2. The MITI code 4.2 includes various subscales, such as empathy and MI spirit, each scored on a scale from 1 to 5, with lower scores suggesting a need for improvement in MI delivery, while higher scores reflect stronger therapeutic skills and better patient outcomes.

次要结局

  • Turn-takings(12 months)
  • Improvement of Patient(12 months)
  • Metric of Verbal Content (Patient)(12 months)
  • Number of Errors/Deviations(12 months)
  • Metric of Verbal Content (Therapist)(12 months)
  • Credibility of Patient Behavior(12 months)
  • Credibility of Therapist Behavior(12 months)
  • Manipulation Check(12 months)

研究者

发起方
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验