跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07274618
NCT07274618已完成不适用

"Group Based Reverse OSCE" for Teaching Mechanical Ventilation to Nursing Students: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 70 人开始时间: 2025年1月10日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
70
试验地点
2
主要终点
Mechanical ventilation knowledge

研究概览

简要总结

Introduction: Mechanical ventilation (MV) is a critical skill for healthcare professionals, yet traditional teaching methods often fail to adequately prepare students. This study evaluates the effectiveness of an innovative Group-Based Reverse OSCE.

Methods: A quasi-experimental study was conducted with 70 nursing students randomly assigned to either the Reverse OSCE group (n=35) or traditional lecture-based group (n=35). The intervention consisted of a 10-hour workshop featuring five interactive OSCE stations covering ventilator hardware, settings, modes, and alarm management. Knowledge and skills were assessed using validated pre- and post-tests, with statistical analysis performed via independent and paired t-tests (SPSS v25).

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
None

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • students from the nursing discipline who were in their clinical internship or clerkship students who completed relevant coursework in respiratory physiology, and had successfully passed the theoretical course in critical care.
  • no prior participation in similar ventilator training workshops within the past six months, demonstrating willingness for voluntary participation, and being able to attend the full 10-hour workshop (including both theoretical and practical components).

排除标准

  • partial attendance in the workshop, withdrawal at any stage of the study the occurrence of acute medical or emergency conditions interfering with participation or failure to complete the pre- and post-intervention assessment tools.

结局指标

主要结局

Mechanical ventilation knowledge

时间窗: 1 day

To assess students' knowledge and clinical reasoning in mechanical ventilation, a researcher-developed, mixed-format questionnaire was used. The tool included 20 items such as multiple-choice questions, clinical scenarios, calculation-based items (e.g., RSBI, ventilator settings), and graphic interpretation tasks. Content areas covered ventilator modes, complications, alarm settings, ABG analysis, and weaning criteria, designed in alignment with recent guidelines including the American Heart Association (2023).

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Alireza Sardashti

Director of program

Torbat Heydariyeh University of Medical Sciences

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验