跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04293497
NCT04293497已完成不适用

Clinical Validation of a New Immunochemistry Method Using Antibody of Methionyl-tRNA synthetase1(MARS1) in the Pancreatic Cancer Cell; Multicenter Prospective Study

Gangnam Severance Hospital8 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 97 人开始时间: 2020年2月17日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
97
试验地点
8
主要终点
The comparison of sensitivity between conventional staining method and new staining method

研究概览

简要总结

Identifying the malignancy of pancreatic mass using endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration (EUS-FNA) is important for treatment decision-making and prognosis prediction. The sensitivity of EUS-FNA cytology specimens based on Papanicolaou (Pap) staining is low, which hampers accurate diagnosis of pancreatic mass. We assessed the diagnostic value of immunohistochemical (IHC) and immunofluorescence (IF) staining for methionyl-tRNA synthetase 1 (MARS1).

详细描述

BACKGROUND / AIMS: The sensitivity of endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration cytology used to distinguish the pancreatic mass is low and clinical usefulness is not secured. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical efficacy of a new differential staining method for cytology which is difficult to differentiate by the conventional staining method using pancreatic cancer related protein expressed only in pancreatic cancer.

Hypothesis

The statistical significance between conventional staining method and MARS1 staining in the pancreatic cancer cells collected by endoscopic ultrasound-guided aspiration will be compared to prove the usefulness of the new staining method.

Clinical study design: The expression of MARS1 in the pancreatic cancer cell line obtained by endoscopic ultrasound in patients suspected of having pancreatic cancer using Immunofluorescence or immunohistochemistry staining will be performed to differentiate the presence of the tumor. The sensitivity and specificity of the new staining method will be compared with the conventional staining method and its usefulness be confirmed.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Na
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Diagnostic
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
19 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with pancreatic cancer confirmed by imaging (CT, MRI, PET-CT)
  • Patients with pancreatic cancer diagnosed using cytology by endoscopic ultrasound
  • Patients who underwent surgical treatment with pancreatic cancer

排除标准

  • Minors under the age of 19, vulnerable subjects such as illiteracy
  • Excludes necrotic specimens
  • Samples with non-diagnostic cytology results and insufficient cells for further evaluation
  • Samples classified as neoplastic (benign or other)

结局指标

主要结局

The comparison of sensitivity between conventional staining method and new staining method

时间窗: 1 year

The sensitivity of new staining method will be compared with the conventional Pap staining of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine-needle aspiration cytology

次要结局

  • The evaluation of correlation index of staining at three type slides(1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Sung III Jang

Associate professor

Gangnam Severance Hospital

研究点 (8)

Loading locations...

相似试验