跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02815462
NCT02815462撤回不适用

Impact of Implementing a Real Time Frequent Admitter Risk Score (FAM-FACE-SG) on Readmission Rates: a Pragmatic Cluster Randomised Controlled Trial (RCT).

Singapore General Hospital1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家开始时间: 2016年8月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
撤回
试验地点
1
主要终点
90-day readmission rate

研究概览

简要总结

In an earlier study using electronic health records (EHR), the investigators have identified nine factors to be significantly associated with FA risk. These nine predictors include Furosemide intravenous 40 milligrams or more; Admissions in the past one year; Medifund status; Frequent emergency department use; Anti-depressants treatment in past one year; Charlson comorbidity index; End Stage Renal Failure on dialysis; Subsidized ward stay and Geriatric patient. The investigators have combined these nine predictors into the FAM-FACE-SG score for FA risk (defined as 3 or more inpatient admissions in the following 12 months). The FAM-FACE-SG risk score has the advantage of being deployed in our hospital's enterprise data repository known as Electronic Health Intelligence System or eHINTs for short, on a real-time or near real-time basis. On a daily basis, data from multiple data sources are extracted, transformed and loaded onto the eHINTS system. The system can be programmed to run every midnight to provide risk scores the following morning for patients admitted the previous day.

In this trial, the intervention is to combine the FAM-FACE-SG risk score in addition to a decision making algorithm to guide referrals to various transitional care services based on needs assessment on nursing and function. The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of our intervention in improving healthcare utilization (hospital readmissions, emergency department (ED) attendances, length of stay up to 90 days post-discharge).

详细描述

In an earlier study using electronic health records (EHR), The investigators have identified nine factors to be significantly associated with FA risk. These nine predictors include Furosemide intravenous 40 milligrams or more; Admissions in the past one year; Medifund status; Frequent emergency department use; Anti-depressants treatment in past one year; Charlson comorbidity index; End Stage Renal Failure on dialysis; Subsidized ward stay and Geriatric patient. The investigators have combined these nine predictors into the FAM-FACE-SG score for FA risk (defined as 3 or more inpatient admissions in the following 12 months). The FAM-FACE-SG risk score has the advantage of being deployed in our hospital's enterprise data repository known as Electronic Health Intelligence System or eHINTs for short, on a real-time or near real-time basis. On a daily basis, data from multiple data sources are extracted, transformed and loaded onto the eHINTS system. The system can be programmed to run every midnight to provide risk scores the following morning for patients admitted the previous day.

In this trial, the intervention is to combine the FAM-FACE-SG risk score in addition to a decision making algorithm to guide referrals to various transitional care services based on needs assessment on nursing and function. The primary objective is to evaluate the impact of our intervention in improving healthcare utilization (hospital readmissions, emergency department (ED) attendances, length of stay up to 90 days post-discharge).

The aims of this cluster RCT are to: (1) evaluate the impact of implementing the FAM-FACE-SG risk score in addition to a decision making algorithm to guide Patient Navigator (PN) referrals to various transitional care services based on needs assessment on nursing and function on improving healthcare utilization (hospital readmissions, emergency department (ED) attendances, length of stay up to 90 days post-discharge); (2) measure the implementation of the risk score (Fidelity of the PNs in adhering to the protocol in recruiting patients according the score priority; Referral rate of the PNs to various transitional care services; Qualitative feedback from PNs on the perceived benefits and behavior change after receiving the scores); (3) conduct an economic analysis of the cost-benefit of implementing the risk score.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Health Services Research
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
21 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Singapore General Hospital wards with patient navigators
  • •Patients who are frequent admitters (defined as 3 or more hospital admissions in the preceding 12 months)

排除标准

  • •Haematology, Oncology, Emergency department, obstetrics and neonatology wards

研究组 & 干预措施

Intervention

Experimental

FAM-FACE-SG risk score + decision making algorithm

干预措施: FAMFACESG (Other)

Control

Active Comparator

Usual Care

干预措施: Control (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

90-day readmission rate

时间窗: 90 days

次要结局

  • 90-day ED attendance rate(90 days)
  • index hospital admission length of stay(90 days)
  • cumulative length of stay 90 days after index hospital discharge(90 days)
  • Fidelity of the PNs in following the protocol in recruiting patients according the score priority(90 days)
  • Proportion of high and medium risk patients recruited in both intervention and control groups(90 days)
  • 30-day readmission rate(30 days)
  • 30-day ED attendance rate(30 days)
  • Referral rate of the PNs to various transitional care services(90 days)
  • Qualitative feedback from PNs on the perceived benefits and behaviour change after receiving the scores(1 year)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验