COMPARISON OF AIRWAY NERVE BLOCK VERSUS NEBULIZED LIDOCAINE ON HEMODYNAMIC RESPONSES DURING AWAKE FIBEROPTIC INTUBATION, A RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 80
- 试验地点
- 1
研究概览
简要总结
This prospective randomized controlled trial aims to compare the effectiveness of airway nerve blocks versus nebulized lidocaine in attenuating hemodynamic responses during awake fiberoptic intubation in adult patients with anticipated difficult airways. Eighty patients undergoing elective surgery requiring awake fiberoptic intubation will be randomly assigned to receive either airway nerve blocks (glossopharyngeal and transtracheal blocks with lidocaine) or nebulized lidocaine. The primary outcome will be changes in heart rate and mean arterial pressure during and after intubation. Secondary outcomes include intubation conditions, patient comfort, cough severity, intubation time, and procedure-related complications. The study aims to identify the most effective airway anesthesia technique for maintaining hemodynamic stability and improving patient tolerance during awake fiberoptic intubation.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Participant)
盲法说明
2
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 65 Years（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Adults aged 18 to 65 years. American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) physical status I-III. Scheduled for elective surgery requiring awake fiberoptic intubation. Anticipated difficult airway. Able and willing to provide written informed consent
排除标准
- •Known allergy or hypersensitivity to lidocaine or other local anesthetics. Coagulopathy or bleeding disorders. Severe respiratory disease. Hemodynamic instability. Pregnancy. Refusal to participate in the study. Inability to cooperate with awake fiberoptic intubation or study procedures
研究者
Aniqa Intizar
The Principal Investigator
Mayo Hospital Lahore