跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02176616
NCT02176616Unknown不适用

Evaluation of Proper Radiofrequency Catheter Ablation Strategy for the Patients Who Were Changed to Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation From Persistent Atrial Fibrillation

Yonsei University2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 120 人开始时间: 2014年6月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
120
试验地点
2
主要终点
number of Clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation

研究概览

简要总结

  1. Purpose of the study
  1. To compare clinical outcome, procedure time, complication rate of patients who were changed to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from persistent atrial fibrillation between ablation with conventional pulmonary vein isolation and ablation with conventional pulmonary vein isolation with conventional linear ablation.
  1. Scientific evidence of the study

  2. In atrial fibrillation patients, the maintenance of normal sinus rhythm showed significant reduction of mortality.

  3. drug therapy with anti-arrhythmic drug showed many complications and side effect, thus non-drug therapy such as catheter ablation is developed.

  4. catheter ablation has been performed for 10years world-wide, and showed superior treatment outcome compared with drug therapy.

  5. However, there are no consensus for proper ablation strategy in patients who were changed to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from persistent atrial fibrillation .

  6. additional ablation make extent of myocardial injury and paradoxically increase recurrence rate, thus still controversial.

  7. Therefore, we will compare conventional pulmonary vein isolation with additional conventional linear ablation.

  8. Methods

  9. Treatment of All patients with atrial fibrillation is performed according to the standard treatment guideline of atrial fibrillation.

  10. there is no additional blood sampling, imaging study, or any other invasive procedure according to the inclusion of the study.

  11. study contents

  1. to evaluate superior ablation strategy in patients who were changed to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from persistent atrial fibrillation
  • compare conventional pulmonary vein isolation with additional liner ablation, both strategies are conventional ablation strategies being performed world-wide.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
19 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • patients who undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation due to symptomatic, drug refractory atrial fibrillation

排除标准

  • patients who do not agree with study inclusion
  • permanent AF refractory to electrical cardioversion
  • AF with valvular disease ≥ grade 2
  • Patients with left atrial diameter greater than 60mm
  • patients with age less than 19

研究组 & 干预措施

linear ablation

Active Comparator

The group of positive control is the operation to add in conventional liner ablation to conventional pulmonary vein isolation with in patients based on patients who were changed to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from persistent atrial fibrillation

干预措施: linear ablation (Procedure)

pulmonary vein isolation

Experimental

The group of negative is the operation to patients with only pulmonary vein isolation based on patients who were changed to paroxysmal atrial fibrillation from persistent atrial fibrillation

干预措施: pulmonary vein isolation (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

number of Clinical recurrence of atrial fibrillation (AF) after catheter ablation

时间窗: 1 year

lifelong, checked per every outpatient clinic visit

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验