跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT07181291
NCT07181291已完成不适用

Pulsed Field or Cryoballoon Pulmonary Vein Isolation for Atrial Fibrillation in Heart Failure (a Propensity Score Matched Comparison)

St. Josefs-Hospital Wiesbaden GmbH12 个研究点 分布在 2 个国家目标入组 700 人开始时间: 2025年9月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
700
试验地点
12
主要终点
Number of subjects with a clinical recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia) occurring more than 8 weeks post-intervention

研究概览

简要总结

Patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) and heart failure with reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrEF) are at particularly high cardiovascular risk. Rhythm-control by means of catheter-based pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) reduces all-cause mortality and rehospitalization for worsening heart failure in these patients. Considering the globally increasing use of the novel "pulsed-field ablation", it is necessary to determine whether this technique can be performed with the same safety and efficacy as the established cryoballoon ablation (CRYO) in this critically ill patient population.

This retrospective, international, multicenter study compares the efficacy and safety of PFA versus CRYO in patients with AF and HFrEF (LVEF ≤40%) undergoing a first-time PVI-only procedure.

Using propensity-score matching to minimize selection bias, the study will retrospectively evaluate whether a non-thermal PFA approach is non-inferior to the established thermal CRYO technique regarding rhythm control, while comparing procedural safety and efficiency in this high-risk population. Non-inferiority is tested against the assumption of a 12-month recurrence rate of 30% with a prespecified non-inferiority margin of 12% (corresponding to a hazard ratio of 1.53).

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Retrospective

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 99 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with paroxysmal or persistent AF and echocardiographically confirmed HFrEF (LVEF ≤ 40%)
  • Patients who underwent their first PVI using pulsed field or cryoballoon ablation as part of clinical routine
  • Patients with regular follow-up via 12-lead ECG or Holter ECG following PVI
  • Patients with at least three months of follow-up

排除标准

  • Patients who did not undergo pulsed field or cryoballoon ablation for first-time PVI
  • Patients with LVEF > 40%
  • Patients who declined the use of their data during initial collection

研究组 & 干预措施

Cryoballoon pulmonary-vein isolation

Electrical isolation of the pulmonary-veins using cryoenergy

干预措施: PVI (Procedure)

Pulsed field pulmonary-vein isolation

Electrical isolation of the pulmonary-veins using pulsed field energy

干预措施: PVI (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Number of subjects with a clinical recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia (AF, atrial flutter, atrial tachycardia) occurring more than 8 weeks post-intervention

时间窗: 12 months

First documented clinical recurrence of any atrial arrhythmia

次要结局

  • Number of subjects with procedure-associated complications(30 days)
  • Number of patients with a rehospitalization (≥ 1 night) due to atrial arrhythmia/ re-ablation or electrical cardioversion starting from day 1 post index procedure(12 months)
  • Number of patients with a rehospitalization (≥ 1 night) due to worsening heart failure(12 months)
  • Death from any cause(12 months)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (12)

Loading locations...

相似试验