The Impact of Price Promotions on Purchases of Confectionery and Snacks: a Randomised Controlled Trial in an Experimental Online Supermarket Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 512
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- To investigate the effect of promotions on the total number of calories selected
研究概览
简要总结
Study Design: Randomised controlled trial
Study Participants: Healthy volunteers from the UK
Planned Sample Size: 500
Planned Study Period: June - December 2021
Objectives and Outcome Measures:
- Primary
- Objective: To investigate the effect of promotions on the total number of calories selected
- Measure: Difference in the absolute energy (kcal) of the final basket between the two groups
- Secondary
Objectives:
- To investigate the effect of promotions on the nutritional content of the items selected overall, and across the individual target food categories
- To explore the impact of removing promotions by socioeconomic status
Measures:
- Difference in the absolute sugar (g, kcal, %E), salt (g), and saturated fat (g, kcal, %E) of the final basket between the two groups
- Difference in the absolute energy (kcal), sugar (g, kcal, %E), salt (g), and saturated fat (g, kcal, %E) between the two groups across the individual target food categories
- Analyses of the primary and secondary outcomes specified above by gender, age group, ethnic group (White vs Non-White), BMI stratified into <30 and ≥30kg/m2 groups, education level (lower vs. higher), and household income (lower vs. higher)
- Exploratory outcomes:
- Objective: To investigate the acceptability of the intervention
- Measures: Rating scores and open-ended answers from the follow-up questionnaire
详细描述
BACKGROUND AND RATIONALE
As a nation people eat more energy, free sugars, saturated fat and salt than recommended for good health. These nutrients contribute to the burden of major chronic diseases, including cardiovascular disease and diabetes, principally through effects on blood cholesterol, blood pressure, insulin sensitivity or body weight. In addition, persistent inequalities in dietary intake underpin inequalities in long-term health outcomes. Despite decades of health promotion, dietary change is slow. Growing evidence suggests people need more than general knowledge about the healthfulness of foods to change behaviour.
Food purchasing is a key antecedent of food consumption and interventions to change food purchasing habits may be more impactful than interventions intended to change consumption at the moment of eating. Supermarkets account for the majority of the weekly expenditure on food and drinks, estimated to be around 87% of all UK retail grocery sales. Impactful, scalable and sustainable approaches within supermarkets are particularly needed in order to shift population-level intakes to be closer to the recommendations for calories, sugar, salt and saturated fat.
Previous systematic reviews of supermarket interventions have identified effective strategies to support dietary change. Evidence is generally stronger for economic (e.g. price interventions or price promotions), positioning and availability interventions. However, many of the interventions described in the literature are multi-component, and there is a challenge in attributing their effectiveness to any single strategy. In the 2020 Obesity Plan, the government in England laid out plans to introduce legislation to restrict the promotion of high fat salt sugar (HFSS) foods, by restricting volume promotions such as 'Buy One Get One Free'. This is based on observational evidence of purchasing habits. Specific evidence of the impact of removing promotions is of interest to policymakers and could help in shaping effective but proportionate policies.
Online supermarkets offer unique opportunities to deliver and support complex nutrition interventions that can often be tested and scaled up more rapidly and feasibly using digital technology than in-store interventions. There is some evidence that baseline purchases made online tend to be healthier than purchases in physical stores, but less is known about the effectiveness of interventions delivered online to change behaviour.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- Triple (Participant, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
盲法说明
Investigators will be blinded to intervention allocation and will not be able to manipulate any study parameter following the initial study set up, as all study procedures are taking part in the online platform. The outcome assessment is blinded, as it happens automatically in the online platform. The statistician who will analyse the data will be blinded to intervention allocation. Participants will only be aware of the trial arm that they are exposed to and will be unaware of the other trial arm
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •UK adults, aged ≥18 years.
- •Able to speak and read English.
- •Willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- •Having access to a computer and Internet.
排除标准
- •They are following a dairy-free or sugar-free diet.
结局指标
主要结局
To investigate the effect of promotions on the total number of calories selected
时间窗: 1 day (immediately after the shopping task)
Difference in the absolute energy (kcal) of the final basket between the two groups
次要结局
- To explore the impact of intervention across socioeconomic status(1 day (immediately after the shopping task))
- To investigate the effect of promotions on the nutritional content of the items selected overall, and across the individual target food categories(1 day (immediately after the shopping task))
