跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02185417
NCT02185417已完成3 期

CSP #597 - Diuretic Comparison Project

VA Office of Research and Development68 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20,723 人开始时间: 2016年6月15日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
3 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
20,723
试验地点
68
主要终点
Proportion of Participants Had a Composite Primary Outcome

研究概览

简要总结

The Diuretic Comparison Project aimed to evaluate whether chlorthalidone, as compared with hydrochlorothiazide, would reduce the risk of major nonfatal cardiovascular disease outcomes and non-cancer-related deaths in older patients with hypertension who were receiving hydrochlorothiazide at baseline. The investigators incorporated the pragmatic methods used by the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Healthcare System to provide a real-world assessment of the effectiveness of chlorthalidone as compared with hydrochlorothiazide in routine clinical care.

详细描述

Thiazide-type diuretics have been in use for more than 50 years and are considered as the first-line treatment for hypertension. Of the more than 1 million Veterans prescribed a thiazide-type diuretic each year, more than 95% receive hydrochlorothiazide, and fewer than 2.5% receive chlorthalidone. However, indirect evidence has been accumulating for many years that chlorthalidone may be more effective than hydrochlorothiazide at preventing cardiovascular events.

The Diuretic Comparison Project was conducted with a clinically integrated design (termed a "point of care" or "pragmatic embedded" trial). The key feature of our design was that, instead of employing local investigators, the investigators developed centralized trial procedures and implemented into the VA electronic health record (EHR) and healthcare delivery systems. This approach enabled us to conduct trial-related interactions and randomization with the use of data in the EHRs, centralize recruitment efforts without the use of site staff, eliminate the need for trial-related visits and procedures, and centralize data capture from administrative databases.

This study was performed to answer a question of whether chlorthalidone is more effective than hydrochlorothiazide at preventing cardiovascular outcomes. Consent was obtained from eligible participants who were willing to participate and their primary care providers. With provider assented to the patient undergoing randomization, 3,523 older patients with hypertension were randomized across 72 VA health care systems. Patients across the US (including Puerto Rico and District of Columbia) were enrolled. Participants were randomly assigned to continue with existing hydrochlorothiazide treatment regimen (25/50mg daily) or switch to a dose equivalent chlorthalidone (12.5/25 mg daily).

The primary outcome was the first occurrence of a composite outcome consisting of a nonfatal cardiovascular event or non-cancer related death. Nonfatal cardiovascular events included nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or urgent coronary revascularization for unstable angina.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
65 Years 至 —(Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • 未提供

排除标准

  • 未提供

研究组 & 干预措施

Hydrochlorothiazide

Active Comparator

Participants remained on the existing hydrochlorothiazide treatment regimen (a daily dose of 25 or 50 mg).

干预措施: Hydrochlorothiazide (HCTZ) (Drug)

Chlorthalidone

Active Comparator

Participants switched to an equivalent dose of chlorthalidone (a daily dose of 12.5 or 25 mg).

干预措施: Chlorthalidone (CTD) (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

Proportion of Participants Had a Composite Primary Outcome

时间窗: Outcome data collection was performed from study randomization until the participants deceased, withdrawn, or reached end of study (Up to 5.4 years for the first patient enrolled and an average of 2.4 years for all participants).

The primary outcome was the first occurrence of a composite endpoint consisting of a nonfatal cardiovascular event or non-cancer related death. Nonfatal cardiovascular events included nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or urgent coronary revascularization for unstable angina. Time to the first event was computed based on the earliest hospital admission or death dates. Ascertainment of study outcomes was made with the use of administrative and clinical data obtained from VA EHRs through June 1, 2022, from records of Medicare claims obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services through 2021, and from National Death Index records through 2019. Trial outcomes were ascertained with the use of validated EHR phenotypes and, when needed, manual adjudication. Manually adjudicated outcomes were evaluated by investigators and staff who were unaware of group assignment.

Time From Randomization to Composite Primary Outcome

时间窗: Outcome data collection was performed from study randomization until the participants deceased, withdrawn, or reached end of study (Up to 5.4 years for the first patient enrolled and an average of 2.4 years for all participants).

Time to study primary outcome was defined as years from randomization to the first occurrence of a composite endpoint, consisting of a nonfatal cardiovascular event or non-cancer related death. Nonfatal cardiovascular events included nonfatal myocardial infarction, stroke, hospitalization for heart failure, or urgent coronary revascularization for unstable angina. For participants who had a primary outcome, time to event was determined as the earliest admission or death date. Ascertainment of study outcomes was made with the use of administrative and clinical data obtained from VA EHRs through June 1, 2022, from records of Medicare claims obtained from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services through 2021, and from National Death Index records through 2019. Trial outcomes were ascertained with the use of validated EHR phenotypes and, when needed, manual adjudication. Manually adjudicated outcomes were evaluated by investigators and staff who were unaware of group assignment.

次要结局

  • Proportion of Participants Had Nonfatal Myocardial Infarction(Outcome data collection was performed from study randomization until the participants deceased, withdrawn, or reached end of study (Up to 5.4 years for the first patient enrolled and an average of 2.4 years for all participants).)
  • Proportion of Participants Deceased and Not Related to Cancer(Outcome data collection was performed from study randomization until the participants deceased, withdrawn, or reached end of study (Up to 5.4 years for the first patient enrolled and an average of 2.4 years for all participants).)
  • Proportion of Participants Had Nonfatal Stroke(Outcome data collection was performed from study randomization until the participants deceased, withdrawn, or reached end of study (Up to 5.4 years for the first patient enrolled and an average of 2.4 years for all participants).)
  • Proportion of Participants Had Hospitalization for Heart Failure(Outcome data collection was performed from study randomization until the participants deceased, withdrawn, or reached end of study (Up to 5.4 years for the first patient enrolled and an average of 2.4 years for all participants).)
  • Proportion of Participants Had Unstable Angina Leading to Urgent Coronary Revascularization(Collection of outcome data were performed from randomization until participants deceased, withdrawn, or reached end of study (Up to 5.4 years for the first patient enrolled and an average of 2.4 years for all participants).)

研究者

申办方类型
Fed
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (68)

Loading locations...

相似试验