MeSenteric SpAring Versus High Ligation Ileocolic Resection for the Prevention of REcurrent Crohn's DiseaSe (SPARES)

There is increasing evidence to suggest that the mesentery may play an active role in the pathophysiology of Crohn's disease. There is significant clinical, endoscopic, and surgical recurrence of disease following ileocolic resection at the site of the anastomosis. The study is seeking to understand if the mesentery plays a role in recurrence following ileocolic resection.

Crohn's disease (CD) is a chronic inflammatory disease of the intestinal tract with an unknown etiology and an unknown cure. The characteristic transmural inflammation can progress to refractory inflammatory disease, stricturing disease, and fistulizing disease - all potential indications for surgery when medical management has been exhausted. An important tenant to remember is that surgery is not curative but is rather an adjunct to maximal medical therapy.

One third of patients with Crohn's disease (CD) will require a major abdominal resection within 5 years of their diagnosis, and two-thirds will ultimately require operative management at least once during the course of their disease.

Unfortunately, surgery for Crohn's disease (CD) is not curative and disease recurrence is common with 62% having endoscopic recurrence at six months, and 80% and 30% of patients having endoscopic and clinical recurrence, respectively, at one year. A third of these patients will require a reoperation at 10 years and up to 80% will require an additional operation by 15 years.This undoubtedly leads to an increased probability of malabsorption syndrome and decreased quality of life.

A significant volume of research has been conducted in attempt to determine how to prevent postoperative recurrence of CD following an ileocolic resection. Some studies have focused on the timing of resuming postoperative medical therapy. Others have looked at surgical technique at the time of ileocolic resection including anatomic configuration of the anastomosis and performing a stapled versus handsewn anastomosis. Various configurations include a side to side anastomosis, end to end, and Kono-S anastomosis. A randomized clinical trial compared a side to side versus an end to end, and found endoscopic recurrence rates were similar in the two groups (42.5% versus 37.9%) at a mean follow up of 11.9 months. A later multi-institution international trial of the Kono S anastomosis determined that the anastomosis was associated with a decreased surgical recurrence rate as compared to conventional anastomoses; 5 and 10 year surgical recurrence-free survival was 98.6%.15 Several Cochrane Database reviews have reported no difference in a stapled versus handsewn anastomosis for an ileocolic resection. Therefore, other than the potential decreased recurrence with the Kono-S anastomosis, no other surgical techniques have altered the postoperative recurrence rate of CD following an ileocolic resection.