跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2024/03/064121
CTRI/2024/03/064121尚未招募不适用

Correlation of Pain Tolerance with Participant Predicated VS Therapist Estimated One RM in Normal Individuals

未提供1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 165 人开始时间: 2024年3月25日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
尚未招募
入组人数
165
试验地点
1
主要终点
1. Intensity of Galvanic Current

研究概览

简要总结

There are lack of evidences regarding correlation of pain tolerance and strength in the Population. In previous studies pain threshold was measured by providing heat using Medoc Thermal Sensory Analyzer ,Pressure Algometer or Autoalgometer, Ice Cold Cylinder, but as it is not available in our OPD we prefer using Galvanic Current for its availability . In this study pain tolerance will be checked using galvanic current

As 1 RM is very important entity in exercise program we want to find if it is correlated with pain tolerance

Aim of our study is to check whether individual who have less pain tolerance assume that they have less strength or Is there any correlation or discrepancy between participant predicted and therapist estimated 1RM.

The implications and therapeutic applications of these findings are significant and wide ranging if laboratory  based measurement of individual differences in pain sensitivity can prospectively predict individual differences in acute clinical pain, chronic pain and pain medication response.

In multiple papers and reviews, recent research has highlighted the potential therapeutic uses of experimental pain assessment (e.g., for predicting post-operative pain, therapy response, etc.). These papers and reviews have used quantitative sensory testing to quantify pain sensitivity.

Quantitative sensory assessments of pain sensitivity aren’t used very often because of the time, money, and expertise requirements, not to mention their costs. So, the purpose of this study is to determine whether self-reporting can be a valid indicator of a person’s pain threshold and patient anticipated 1 RM.

研究设计

研究类型
Observational

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 60.00 Year(s)(—)

入选标准

  • 1.18 to 60 Years of Individual 2.Both Genders 3.Individuals with Normal Superficial Sensations like Touch ,Pain, Temparature at the forearm region.

排除标准

  • 1.Individuals with Co morbidities like Diabetes 2.Individuals with Dermatological Condition 3.Individuals with Neurological Condition 4.Injuries or lesions around knee.

结局指标

主要结局

1. Intensity of Galvanic Current

时间窗: 6 months

2.Hand Held Dynamometer

时间窗: 6 months

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
未提供
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Bharati D Asgaonkar

Associate Professor

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验