跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03416985
NCT03416985已完成不适用

A Comparative Study of Electric Toothbrushes for the Efficacy Plaque Removal and the Effect on Plaque Accumulation and Gingivitis.

University of California, Los Angeles1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 90 人开始时间: 2018年1月2日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
90
试验地点
1
主要终点
Plaque Index

研究概览

简要总结

It is well accepted that the greatest contributor to the health of the periodontium and dentition is regular and thorough dental plaque removal, typically by means of adequate toothbrushing. Although patients are typically informed about the risks of substandard oral hygiene and the contributing factors in oral/dental disease by dental professionals, research has shown that an undesirably high proportion of adults find thorough toothbrushing with a standard manual toothbrush to achieve a plaque-free state challenging, as evidenced by high worldwide levels of gingivitis and/or periodontitis.

详细描述

The purpose of this study is to clinically evaluate the plaque removal efficacy of two electric powered toothbrushes after a single use, as well as the effect on plaque accumulation and gingivitis after 14 days and 30 days period. Simultaneously, a comparison against a manual toothbrush will be made.

Study design: randomised, single blinded, parallel.

After the screening procedure and based on inclusion requirements, all subjects will receive oral prophylaxis (T0) to ensure a baseline of 0 Plaque Index (PI) prior to the first appointment (T1). The subjects will be instructed not to use a tooth brush or any mechanical cleaning device until the initial PI and Gingival Indexes (GI) are taken at 24 hours after T0.

The subjects will be randomized into 3 groups, and the will be provided one of the three evaluated toothbrushes, as well as toothpaste. All subjects will be using identical toothpaste and will receive oral hygiene instructions based on the manufacturer's recommendations.

At T1 initial GI and PI will be taken prior to brushing followed by a second PI reading immediately after the first use of the power driven toothbrush.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
Triple (Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Good overall health
  • At least 20 teeth present, not including 3rd Molars

排除标准

  • Poor manual dexterity or mentally handicap;
  • Presence of removable intra-oral prosthesis
  • Current orthodontic therapy
  • Severe Periodontal condition or caries teeth in need of immediate attention
  • Pregnant women
  • Subjects that use medications that may effect oral health
  • No Systemic diseases/conditions such as diabetes mellitus, heart disease.
  • Use of plaque inhibiting toothpaste, mouthwash, interdental flossing in the period of the study

研究组 & 干预措施

Manual Toothbrush

Active Comparator

Patients will be asked to use a manual toothbrush for 30 days

干预措施: Oral B Healthy Clean Manual Toothbrush (Device)

Sonic Toothbrush

Active Comparator

Patients will be asked to use a sonic toothbrush for 30 days

干预措施: BURST Sonic Oral Care (Device)

Pulsating Toothbrush

Active Comparator

Patients will be asked to use a pulsating toothbrush for 30 days

干预措施: Philipps Sonicare DiamondClean 300 Series (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Plaque Index

时间窗: Baseline, 1 month

plaque index as evaluated by Silness-Loe Index: index recording both soft debris and mineralized deposits on teeth (index 0 (no plaque) to 3).

Gingival Index

时间窗: Baseline, 1 month

gingival index as evaluated by Silness-Loe Index, Range 0-3: Score 0 = Normal gingiva. Score 1 = Mild inflammation - slight change in color, slight edema. No bleeding on probing. Score 2 = Moderate inflammation - redness, edema, glazing. Bleeding on probing. Score 3 = Severe inflammation - marked redness and edema, ulceration. Tendency toward spontaneous bleeding.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Joan PiAnfruns, DMD

Assistant Clinical Professor

University of California, Los Angeles

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验