Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) Buccal Screening Evaluation Using an RT-PCR Assay and a Rapid ELISA Test Among Symptomatic and Asymptomatic Patients: the CORDAGES Study
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 1,500
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Proportion of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive patients for the two different sampling types (buccal vs nasopharyngeal) and two methods (ELISA POCT vs RT-PCR)
研究概览
简要总结
The main objective is to expand screening for severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) by evaluating the diagnostic accuracy of the RT-PCR test (Cobas® Roche, Switzerland) and the ELISA Point of Contact Testing (PORTABLE COVID-19 ANTIGEN LAB® Stark, Italy) on buccal swab compared to the reference test, the RT-PCR test (Cobas® Roche, Switzerland) on nasopharyngeal swab.
Secondary objectives
- To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of oral swab RT-PCR and POCT relative to the quantitative amplification (Ct) values of the NP Swab RT-PCR assay.
- Analyze RT-PCR amplification cycle thresholds (Ct) and POCT diagnostic accuracy as a function of the presence and timing of symptoms.
- Among symptomatic participants, compare clinical presentations between positive and negative participants on the NP swab RT-PCR test.
- The RT-PCR test may be imperfectly sensitive, ranging from 71 to 98%3. Using a Bayesian latent class model, the investigators will assess the true accuracy of POCT as it does not require the assumption that any one test or combination of tests is perfect14,15.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Diagnostic
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •18+ patient eligible for COVID-19 testing in Monaco
- •symptoms suggestive of COVID-19
- •contact with a confirmed case of COVID-19
排除标准
- •refusal to participate in the study
- •preventive screening of professional groups
- •inability to return to the screening center within 48-72 hours of the first visit.
结局指标
主要结局
Proportion of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive patients for the two different sampling types (buccal vs nasopharyngeal) and two methods (ELISA POCT vs RT-PCR)
时间窗: 48 Hours
Number of severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) positive patients by sampling type (buccal and nasopharyngeal swab) and analytical method (ELISA POCT vs RT-PC)
次要结局
- Comparison of Ct values in buccal and nasopharyngeal swabs(48 Hours)
