跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06394856
NCT06394856已完成不适用

Comparison of Outcomes of Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques

Sohag University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 89 人开始时间: 2018年7月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
89
试验地点
1
主要终点
retear rate

研究概览

简要总结

rotator cuff tears are one of the most common shoulder issues , affecting 20.7% of the general population .

详细描述

accompanied by shoulder pain and dysfunction

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
40 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •full-thickness supraspinatus
  • •degenerative tears
  • •age range 40 :65

排除标准

  • •subscapularis tear
  • •small and massive tears
  • •traumatic tears
  • •partial -thickness tear
  • •revisioin surgery
  • •glenohumeral arthretic changes and shoulder instability

研究组 & 干预措施

knotless group

Active Comparator

rotator cuff repair with a modified knotless anchors

干预措施: Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques (Procedure)

knot-tying group

Active Comparator

rotator cuff repair with classic knot-tying double-row suture bridge technique by classic anchors

干预措施: Rotator Cuff Repair With a Modified Versus Classic Double-Row Suture -Bridge Techniques (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

retear rate

时间窗: 3 years

retear rate

次要结局

  • time(3 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Hossam Eldin Mohamed Ahmed ElAzab

assistant professor orthopedic department

Sohag University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验