跳至主要内容
临床试验/CTRI/2016/12/007534
CTRI/2016/12/007534招募中不适用

Comparison of direct and guide-wire assisted techniques of radial artery cannulation in patients posted for emergency surgery- a randomized clinical trial.

Jawaharlal Institute of Postgraduate Medical Education and Research1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 100 人开始时间: 2014年5月5日最近更新:

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
招募中
入组人数
100
试验地点
1
主要终点
To compare success rate of cannulation on first attempt between the two techniques.

研究概览

简要总结

Invasive arterial pressuremonitoring and frequent blood gas analysis have become essential components forphysiologic optimization and anesthesia management of emergency surgical proceduresin patients presenting with major blood loss or sepsis. Radial artery is usedcommonly for cannulation as it is easily accessible and associated with lessincidence of post-cannulation complications (1). Various techniques exist forarterial cannulation like the direct over-the-needle cannulation(2,3,4),guide-wire assisted catheterization(2,3,4), liquid stylet technique(5), andultrasound-guided catheterization(6).

Previous studies have shown thatradial artery cannulation with guide-wire assistance was more successfulcompared to the direct technique in patients undergoing various cardiovascularand neurosurgical procedures in the elective set-up, done by staff anesthesiologists(3, 4). In the emergency surgical suite the arterial cannulations are mostly doneby residents with limited experience and the direct cannulation is the mostcommon technique employed. However the direct cannulation technique may bedifficult in patients with low arterial pressure, requiring multiple attemptsand causing considerable delay. The purpose of this study is to assess whether arterialcannulation can be achieved faster, with fewer attempts, using the guide-wireassisted technique.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Computer generated randomization
盲法
Not Applicable

入排标准

年龄范围
18.00 Year(s) 至 80.00 Year(s)(—)
性别
All

入选标准

  • Adult patients of either gender, presenting with emergency surgical conditions requiring invasive blood pressure monitoring or frequent arterial blood gas measurements.

排除标准

  • Patients with inadequate ulnar collateral circulation identified by performing modified Allen’s test.
  • Patients/patient surrogates who don’t give valid informed consent.

结局指标

主要结局

To compare success rate of cannulation on first attempt between the two techniques.

时间窗: 18 months

次要结局

  • 1. Number of attempts taken for cannulation between the two techniques.(18 months)
  • 2. Time taken for a successful cannulation between the two techniques.(18 months)
  • 3. Overall success rate of cannulation with the two techniques.

研究者

申办方类型
Research institution and hospital

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验