跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT04214938
NCT04214938已完成4 期

Hypertonic Saline Enhances The Field of View of Clinicians and Ease of Procedures: A Double Blind, Randomized, Controlled Trial Comparing the Efficacy of Intranasal Hypertonic Saline, Xylometazoline, Lidocaine, and Isotonic Saline

Selcuk University0 个研究点目标入组 200 人开始时间: 2016年2月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
已完成
入组人数
200
主要终点
Quality of view, ease of procedure

研究概览

简要总结

Transnasal Flexible Pharyngolaryngoscopy (NPL) is one of the most common and fundamental evaluation procedures in otolaryngologist's practice, performed in both outpatient and ward settings.In the studies the desired properties for an effective topical agent to be used in patients undergoing NPL. To date, only a local anesthetic and/or decongestant substance is applied to the nostrils to relieve pain. However, to date, no studies have been performed in which intranasal hypertonic saline was used prior to nasal endoscopy.

详细描述

NPL is a technique that has been used for more than 100 years and increases brightness, magnification and the ability to take still and video images (3). NPL is a simple, safe, cost-effective, and generally well-tolerated procedure. However, a portion of patients may refuse to allow the procedure to be repeated as they find it uncomfortable, intolerable, or painful.To date, only a local anesthetic and/or decongestant substance is applied to the nostrils to relieve pain and increase the field of view and to reduce the duration of examination and unpleasant sensations for the patient on NPL procedures.This randomised control trial was undertaken to compare the application of nasal hypertonic sea water (3.5%) with nasal lidocaine 10%, topical nasal decongestant xylometazoline 0.1% (OtrivineTM) and nasal isotonic serum physiologic as placebo group in relation to how they effectively improve the adequacy of the examination and if they reduce pain and discomfort associated with endoscopic nasal examination.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Other
盲法
Double (Participant, Investigator)

盲法说明

The caregiver administering the nasal spray, the subject, and the otolaryngologist carrying out nasendoscopy were all uninformed as to the type of spray employed.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 65 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •Subjects who undergone diagnostic nasal endoscopy between 2015- 2017

排除标准

  • •Had experienced nasal endoscopy before
  • •Allergic to either xylometazoline or lidocaine
  • •Cardiovascular disease
  • •Severe septal deviation

研究组 & 干预措施

Hypertonic sea water

Active Comparator

The patient was applied intranasal hypertonic sea water (3.5% sodium chloride) before the nasoendoscopy procedure.

干预措施: Intranasal solutions application were done including one solution for per patient before nasoendoscopy procedure according to randomization (Other)

Lidocaine

Active Comparator

The patient was applied intranasal Vemcaine as TLA (10% lidocaine; AstraZeneca, Södertälje, Sweden) before the nasoendoscopy procedure.

干预措施: Intranasal solutions application were done including one solution for per patient before nasoendoscopy procedure according to randomization (Other)

Xylometazoline

Active Comparator

The patient was applied intranasal Otrivine (0.1% xylometazoline hydrochloride, GlaxoSmithKline, Brentford, UK ) before the nasoendoscopy procedure.

干预措施: Intranasal solutions application were done including one solution for per patient before nasoendoscopy procedure according to randomization (Other)

0.9% Sodium chloride

Placebo Comparator

The patient was applied intranasal placebo (0.9% sodium chloride) before the nasoendoscopy procedure.

干预措施: Intranasal solutions application were done including one solution for per patient before nasoendoscopy procedure according to randomization (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Quality of view, ease of procedure

时间窗: 2 years

The primary outcome was to evaluate clinicians' field of the view according to Visual Analog Scale (VAS) questionnaire survey. Shortly after endoscopy, the endoscopist was asked to indicate the degree of quality of view, ease of procedure on a VAS (1: impossible to pass the endoscope, 100: excellent field of view)

次要结局

  • Post-op pain(2 years)
  • Post-op discomfort(2 years)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Merih Onal

Associate Professor

Selcuk University

相似试验