Effects of Genuine vs Sham Acupuncture and Communication Type on Relaxation

Background It is commonly reported that individuals experience a sense of relaxation during acupuncture treatment. However it is not known if the effects are related to the specific effects of needling or non-specific effects associated with the treatment procedure e.g. the communication with the therapist. It is well known that the way in which patients and clinicians communicate with each other affect treatment outcome, and one of the possible mechanisms to mediate the communication-related treatment outcomes is patient expectations.

Aims The aim of the study is therefore to investigate if it is possible to influence the individuals' expectations to improve outcome; in this particular setting the relaxing effects of one single acupuncture treatment with genuine or sham needles combined with positive or neutral communication regarding expected relaxing effects. The investigators also aim to investigate if different therapists influence how individuals perceive treatment effects, blinding and the communication during treatment with genuine and sham acupuncture.

Procedure Nine therapists performed treatments on voluntary healthy individuals who were randomized to a 30 minute treatment session with a) genuine penetrating acupuncture in traditional acupuncture points or b) non-penetrating sham needles in sham points. Within groups, individuals were further randomized to two communication styles 1) neutral communication or 2) strengthened positive communication regarding expectations concerning relaxing effects.

Outcome measures Perceived degree of expectancy and relaxation was measured directly before and after the treatment. The individuals also rated how they experienced the therapist´s communication style regarding grade of positivity and if they believed that the therapist had given them genuine or sham acupuncture directly after treatment.