Comparison of the Accuracy of Different Periodontal Probes for Peri-implant Pocket Registration
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 50
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- peri-implant probing pocket depth
研究概览
简要总结
Various types of periodontal probes (e.g., metal probes, plastic/bendable probes, electronic periodontal probes) are used for peri-implant pocket depth registration; however, depending on the shape and size of the prosthetic restoration an accurate peri-implant pocket registration might be impeded with standard metal probes. There is currently no systematic assessment of which probe is more accurate in peri-implant pocket registration. Therefore, peri-implant pocket registration of 50 patients with a screw-retained prosthetic restoration will be recorded with 3 different periodontal probes; i.e., with a metal probe, with a plastic probe, and with an automatic periodontal probe, before and after removal of the prosthetic restoration.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Prospective
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •screw-retained prosthetic implant restoration
排除标准
- •cemented prosthetic implant restoration
结局指标
主要结局
peri-implant probing pocket depth
时间窗: 1 day (single measurement)
peri-implant probing pocket depth in mm
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Kristina Bertl
Principal Investigator
Malmö University
