跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT05837780
NCT05837780Enrolling By Invitation不适用

Three Dimensional Evaluation of Maxillary Arch Changes After Using Two Different Construction Techniques of Nasoalveolar Molding Devices in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients (Randomized Controlled Trial)

Minia University1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 36 人开始时间: 2023年1月3日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
Enrolling By Invitation
发起方
入组人数
36
试验地点
1
主要终点
Alveolar cleft width

研究概览

简要总结

This study includes Three Dimensional Evaluation of Maxillary Arch Changes After Using Two Different Construction Techniques of Nasoalveolar Molding Devices in Unilateral Cleft Lip and Palate Patients (Randomized Controlled Trial) Null hypothesis: there is no difference between using conventionally constructed nasoalveolar molding device and using digitally constructed nasoalveolar molding device

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Double (Participant, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

年龄范围
7 Days 至 1 Month(Child)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Good general health without any systematic disease, disability or other syndromes Non syndromatic unilateral cleft lip and palate Both genders Age less than one month Parents willing to participate in the study and sign informed consent

排除标准

  • Patients exhibiting systemic disease, disability or other syndrome, parents denying participating in the study or not given their informed consent

结局指标

主要结局

Alveolar cleft width

时间窗: 3 months

measurement of width between two alveolar segments

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Minia University
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Amany Alaa Abd el Aziz

assistant Lecturer of prosthodontics

Minia University

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Effect of Using Two Different Construction... | 临床试验