Comparison of General Anesthesia and Deep Sedation in Enbronchial Coil Treatment
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 32
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- recovery time measurement
研究概览
简要总结
This prospective, randomize study was conducted in a university hospital. Bronchoscopic lung volume reduction (BLVR) coil treatment has recently been introduced into clinical practice as an alternative for patients chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with severe refractory heterorogenous emphysema to conventional medical treatment. Thirty two patients diagnosed with (COPD) with severe refractory heterorogenous emphysema undergoing BLVR coil treatment were included in the study. Seventeen procedure were performed under general anesthesia and fifteen procedure were performed under deep sedation-analgesia. in the general anesthesia group peak pressure, air leakage and end-tidal carbon dioxide were recorded. In the both groups pulse oximeter, transcutaneous carbondioxide, recovery time, bronchospasm, laryngospasm, pneumothorax, massive bleeding were recorded.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Na
- 干预模型
- Single Group
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •patients diagnosed with COPD with undergoing BLVR coil treatment.
排除标准
- •patients who refuse to participate in the study
研究组 & 干预措施
randomized
干预措施: method (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
recovery time measurement
时间窗: 2 hours
to compare the recovery time in both groups
complication rate
时间窗: 2 hours
to compare the complication rate in both groups
次要结局
未报告次要终点
