Comparison of Peer Led versus Professional Led Training in Basic Life Support among School Students 14 - 18 years of age
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 尚未招募
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 158
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- 1. To compare proportion of participants who would ensure adequate chest compression depth among the study groups.
研究概览
简要总结
Peer-led training has been successfully implemented in various educational settings, capitalizing on the unique dynamics and communication styles among peers. It offers the possibility of creating a more comfortable and relatable learning environment for students, potentially enhancing engagement and knowledge retention. Peer-led BLS training empowers students to take on roles of responsibility and leadership within their school community. This not only enhances their self-esteem but also cultivates a sense of duty towards the well-being of others. Utilizing peer instructors can be a cost-effective approach for schools, as it minimizes the need for external professional trainers. Moreover, the skills acquired by students can be perpetuated through peer-led initiatives, contributing to long-term sustainability.
The purpose of this research is to compare the effectiveness of peer-led BLS training with traditional health professional-led training among high school students. The study focuses on specific objectives to evaluate key aspects of BLS performance and knowledge retention within these two training modalities.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 盲法
- None
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 14.00 Year(s) 至 18.00 Year(s)（—）
- 性别
- All
入选标准
- •Students from classes 9, 10, 11, 12 in school in Bangalore
- •Participants and their parents or guardian must express willingness to participate in the study by providing informed consent
- •School student interested in serving as peer educator will be included after obtaining their consent and the consent of their parents or guardians.
- •Students included in the study must have a history of regular school attendance to ensure a consistent level of exposure to educational settings.
排除标准
- •Students or their parents/guardians who decline to participate or withdraw consent at any stage 2.Students with pre existing medical conditions that may limit their ability to participate in the BLS training or assessments
- •Students who have received formal Basic Life Support (BLS) training before the study
- •Individuals with a known history of trauma, severe anxiety, or psychological conditions that may be exacerbated by participation in BLS training or assessments.
结局指标
主要结局
1. To compare proportion of participants who would ensure adequate chest compression depth among the study groups.
时间窗: Baseline | 6 weeks after the intervention
2. To compare proportion of participants who could ensure mouth to mouth breathing and adequate breath rate among the study groups.
时间窗: Baseline | 6 weeks after the intervention
次要结局
- To compare retention of BLS knowledge among the study groups(6 weeks)
研究者
Mohammad Nazar Ahmed
Command Hospital Air Force Bangalore