跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT02697279
NCT02697279终止不适用

Evaluation of Loop Drainage Technique Versus Standard Incision and Drainage for Treatment of Simple Soft Tissue Abscesses

University of Maryland, Baltimore1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 5 人开始时间: 2016年10月1日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
5
试验地点
1
主要终点
Procedure failure rate

研究概览

简要总结

In the Emergency Department (ED), patients frequently seek medical treatment for cutaneous abscesses. Traditional incision and drainage (I&D), with or without packing of cutaneous abscesses has long been the accepted standard of care. This procedure is often very painful for the patient. Additionally, compliance with wound care and follow-up can present barriers to proper care and healing. Research has suggested that incision and loop drainage of an abscess may be another effective treatment for simple cutaneous abscess. Thus far, research into this procedure has been limited to the pediatric population with small sample sizes. In these previous studies, this technique was found to be an effective and less painful treatment for abscesses. Research has not been done in the adult population using this procedure. If this procedure is found to be as effective and less painful in the adult population, then it should be considered as a potential preferred I&D method for cutaneous abscess in the ED.

详细描述

Patients who meet study criteria for treatment of a simple cutaneous abscess and desire to be a part of this study, will be consented. Study subjects will be enrolled and randomly assigned to either the study or control groups.

Control Group- standard I & D method for cutaneous abscess.

Study Group- Loop Technique:

  1. Gather all of your material and bring to bedside
  2. Clean area with chlorhexidine or iodine swabs
  3. Anesthetize area
  4. Use your scalpel to make small 5mm incision at most fluctuant area of abscess
  5. Explore cavity with your hemostat and break down loculations
  6. Make second incision less than 4cm away from first incision. Feel borders of abscess, and try to make second incision as far within cavity as you can.
  7. For larger abscesses can repeat step 5 thus creating several LOOPs.
  8. Irrigate cavity with saline flush
  9. Pass hemostat through both incisions and pull loop vessel, penrose, or bottom of glove through. Keep your loop device equal in length on both sides.
  10. Tie loop device loosely over 30cc syringe to form LOOP. Usually 5-6 knots. This helps prevent loop from falling out prematurely.
  11. Slide syringe out, and trim free ends of loop. Make sure loop is mobile.
  12. Cover site with dry dressing. Follow-Up-
  • Wound check in 1-2 days
  • Patient may manage drain at home by rotating it to facilitate drainage and prevent adhesion
  • Patient will be instructed to return to the Emergency Department for drain removal in 5-7 days.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者
否

入选标准

  • •18 years or older
  • •Presents to ED with simple cutaneous abscess
  • •Provides informed consent.

排除标准

  • •Under 18 years of age
  • •Abscess too small for performance of procedure
  • •Signs of systemic infection
  • •Need for hospitalization
  • •Previously treated for current abscess
  • •Clinician determines abscess would not be amenable to drainage by loop technique
  • •Patients known to be pregnant
  • •Incarcerated patients
  • •Students / Employees of the facility
  • •Presence of any other condition(s) that the investigator feels makes the patient unsuitable for study inclusion.

研究组 & 干预措施

Traditional Incision and Drainage

Active Comparator

Treatment of a simple cutaneous abscess with traditional incision and drainage with or without packing, decision made at the discretion of the provider.

干预措施: Traditional Incision and Drainage. (Procedure)

Loop drainage

Experimental

Treatment of a simple cutaneous abscess with incision and drainage using the loop drainage technique.

干预措施: Loop drainage (Procedure)

结局指标

主要结局

Procedure failure rate

时间窗: 5 -7 days after procedure

Determining the difference in failure rates between the study group and control group. Treatment failure is a composite outcome defined as having the presence of any of the following: requiring a 2nd incision and drainage procedure, a patient that requires administration of antibiotics after the initial treatment period due to worsening clinical status, a patient that requires hospitalization after the initial treatment period due to worsening clinical status.

次要结局

  • Patient Satisfaction using a visual analog pain scale(5-7 days after procedure)
  • Difference in pain associated with the procedure using a visual analog pain scale(Measured after the procedure on day 1)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Richard Gentry Wilkerson

Assistant Professor

University of Maryland, Baltimore

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验