跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00383799
NCT00383799终止4 期

Comparison of Intravenous Amiodarone Versus Intravenous Procainamide for the Acute Treatment of Regular and Haemodynamically Well Tolerated Wide QRS Tachycardia (Probably of Ventricular Origen). The PROCAMIO Multicenter Study

Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon29 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 302 人开始时间: 2005年9月最近更新:
适应症
干预措施
相关药物

试验速览

阶段
4 期
状态
终止
发起方
入组人数
302
试验地点
29
主要终点
To compare clinically significant cardiac adverse events occurring within 40 minutes from treatment initiation

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to determine whether intravenous amiodarone has less cardiac significant adverse events compared to intravenous procainamide in the acute treatment of haemodynamically well tolerated wide QRS tachycardia, the majority of them of probably ventricular origen.

详细描述

Multicenter, prospective and randomized study in phase IV. A total of 302 patients will be included in the study within 40-50 institutions in Spain. Patients with regular and monomorphic tachycardia ≥ 120 bpm, QRS ≥ 120 ms and haemodynamically well tolerated will be randomized to receive iv amiodarone (single dosage: 5 mg/kg in 20 minutes) vs iv procainamide (single dosage: 10 mg/kg in 20 minutes). The study period will be 40 minutes from infusion initiation. Study variables include the presence of clinically cardiac significant adverse events: hypotension, syncope, heart failure, symptomatic sinus bradycardia, AV block, proarrhythmia and tachycardia acceleration (<20 lpm)and death. Total observation period will be 24 hours after the end of the infusion.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Single Group
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with stable tachycardia ≥120 lpm, QRS ≥120 ms and haemodynamically well tolerated defined as: 1)Systolic blood pressure ≥90 mmHg, 2) absence of dyspnea at rest, 3)absence of peripheric hypoperfusion signs and 4)no severe angina.
  • Age > 18 years
  • Written inform consent obtained

排除标准

  • Treatment with iv amiodarone or iv procainamide during the previous 24 hours
  • QRS tachycardia <120 ms
  • Patients with QRS ≥120 ms tachycardia with haemodynamic compromise that requires urgent cardioversion for termination
  • Irregular tachycardia
  • Tachycardia that is considered as supraventricular due to physician criteria (adenosine and/or vagal manoeuvres response)
  • Patient that do not want to cooperate

研究组 & 干预措施

Group 1

Active Comparator

IV procainamide (single dose: 10 mg/kg over 20 min)

干预措施: iv Procainamide (Drug)

Group 2

Active Comparator

IV Amiodarone (single dose: 5 mg/kg over 20 min)

干预措施: iv Amiodarone (Drug)

结局指标

主要结局

To compare clinically significant cardiac adverse events occurring within 40 minutes from treatment initiation

时间窗: 40 minutes

次要结局

  • To compare efficacy of both therapies in relation to episode termination(40 minuutes)
  • To compare the rate of total adverse events, cardiac and non cardiac, occurring during an observation period of 24 hours after treatment was applied(24 hours)

研究者

发起方
Hospital General Universitario Gregorio Marañon
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (29)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Iv Amiodarone Versus Iv Procainamide to Treat... | 临床试验