跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06899308
NCT06899308进行中(未招募)不适用

Health Surveillance by Constructor University Bremen (CUB) to Assess Germany-wide Students' Health and Wellbeing - Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Approach

Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH6 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 373 人开始时间: 2025年3月17日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
进行中(未招募)
发起方
入组人数
373
试验地点
6
主要终点
Loneliness

研究概览

简要总结

The aim of Health Surveillance is to analyze and describe the state of health of students at Constructor University, key influencing factors and individual resources by using mixed-method design.

详细描述

The aim of Health Surveillance plus the additional research by means of qualitative interviews is to analyze and describe the state of stress and health of students at Constructor University (CU) by using a mixed-methods approach, as well as explore the association and mechanism between stress and health of students at CU, key influencing factors and individual resources. In areas where there is a need for action, the Health Surveillance plus this project the additional qualitative interviews can provide detailed insights and/or in-depth analyses. The Health Surveillance thus provides information on health-related topics and delivers scientifically sound information as a basis for health-promoting discussions in the subsequent follow-up process at various levels (e.g. faculties and departments). In addition, the Health Surveillance plus the additional interviews at CU contributes to comparability with surveys at other German universities through the use of validated and standardized measuring instruments and in-depth qualitative interviews with qualitative content analysis, as well as to add new constructs i.e. artificial intelligence and digital technology use as well as demo-cratic competences, as this turned out to be new and important factors.

Main hypotheses are

  1. The Health Surveillance gives insights into state of stress and health of students at CU, key influencing factors and individual resources by using a mixed-methods approach.
  2. With the Health Surveillance the health-promotion at CU by using a mixed-methods approach, as well as explore the association and mechanism between stress and health of students at CU, can be guided and promotion of mental health (including the reduction of loneliness and discrimination) can be strengthened.
  3. The health of students, their perceived stress, loneliness and discrimination/minorization (disadvantage) as well as substance use interrelates with participation in health promoting activities?
  4. Recommendations can be derived for qualification and skills training of multipliers for health-promoting behavior (e.g., J-peers)?

研究设计

研究类型
Observational
观察模型
Cohort
时间视角
Cross Sectional

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • English language skills
  • Reading and writing skills
  • Internet access
  • Student status
  • Consent to participate in the study

排除标准

  • Illiteracy
  • Massively limited cognitive abilities ( i.e. linguistic components of the digital offerings must be able to be used, and questionnaires completed, or interviews participated in) and severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., severe depression)

研究组 & 干预措施

students in a community case study

Students at Constructor University Bremen being assessed by means of an online questionnaire in 2025

干预措施: questionnaire (Other)

students in Germany

Students at germany wide being assessed by means of an online questionnaire or qualitative interviews in 2026

干预措施: questionnaire (Other)

结局指标

主要结局

Loneliness

时间窗: Baseline

University of California Los Angelese Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) - 3 Items (Schobin, Arriagada \& Gibson-Kunze, 2024), Range 1 (never/nie) - 5 (very often/sehr oft), higher scores mean a worse outcome Loneliness in private and study context - 9 Items (Techniker Krankenkasse, 2024), Range 1 (often) - 4 (never), higher scores mean better outcomes

Health literacy

时间窗: Baseline

Health literacy - 10 Items (Lenartz, Söllner \& Rudinger, 2014), Range 1 (does not apply/trifft überhaupt nicht zu) - 4 (does fully apply/trifft genau zu), higher scores mean a better outcome

Loneliness

时间窗: 2025 and 2026 (no matching)

University of California Los Angelese Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) - 3 Items (Schobin, Arriagada \& Gibson-Kunze, 2024), Range 1 (never/nie) - 5 (very often/sehr oft), higher scores mean a worse outcome Loneliness in private and study context - 9 Items (Techniker Krankenkasse, 2024), Range 1 (often) - 4 (never), higher scores mean better outcomes

Health literacy

时间窗: 2025 and 2026 (no matching)

Health literacy - 10 Items (Lenartz, Söllner \& Rudinger, 2014), Range 1 (does not apply/trifft überhaupt nicht zu) - 4 (does fully apply/trifft genau zu), higher scores mean a better outcome

次要结局

  • Depression and anxiety(Baseline)
  • Subjective health status(Baseline)
  • Student satisfaction(Baseline)
  • HEI-Stress(Baseline)
  • Depression and anxiety(2025 and 2026 (no matching))
  • Subjective health status(2025)
  • Student satisfaction(2025 and 2026 (no matching))
  • HEI-Stress(2025)
  • Subjective health status(2025 and 2026 (no matching))
  • HEI-Stress(2025 and 2026 (no matching))

研究者

发起方
Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Prof. Dr. Sonia Lippke

Professor of Health Promotion and Prevention

Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH

研究点 (6)

Loading locations...

相似试验