Health Surveillance by Constructor University Bremen (CUB) to Assess Germany-wide Students' Health and Wellbeing - Explanatory Sequential Mixed-Methods Approach
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 373
- 试验地点
- 6
- 主要终点
- Loneliness
研究概览
简要总结
The aim of Health Surveillance is to analyze and describe the state of health of students at Constructor University, key influencing factors and individual resources by using mixed-method design.
详细描述
The aim of Health Surveillance plus the additional research by means of qualitative interviews is to analyze and describe the state of stress and health of students at Constructor University (CU) by using a mixed-methods approach, as well as explore the association and mechanism between stress and health of students at CU, key influencing factors and individual resources. In areas where there is a need for action, the Health Surveillance plus this project the additional qualitative interviews can provide detailed insights and/or in-depth analyses. The Health Surveillance thus provides information on health-related topics and delivers scientifically sound information as a basis for health-promoting discussions in the subsequent follow-up process at various levels (e.g. faculties and departments). In addition, the Health Surveillance plus the additional interviews at CU contributes to comparability with surveys at other German universities through the use of validated and standardized measuring instruments and in-depth qualitative interviews with qualitative content analysis, as well as to add new constructs i.e. artificial intelligence and digital technology use as well as demo-cratic competences, as this turned out to be new and important factors.
Main hypotheses are
- The Health Surveillance gives insights into state of stress and health of students at CU, key influencing factors and individual resources by using a mixed-methods approach.
- With the Health Surveillance the health-promotion at CU by using a mixed-methods approach, as well as explore the association and mechanism between stress and health of students at CU, can be guided and promotion of mental health (including the reduction of loneliness and discrimination) can be strengthened.
- The health of students, their perceived stress, loneliness and discrimination/minorization (disadvantage) as well as substance use interrelates with participation in health promoting activities?
- Recommendations can be derived for qualification and skills training of multipliers for health-promoting behavior (e.g., J-peers)?
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Observational
- 观察模型
- Cohort
- 时间视角
- Cross Sectional
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •English language skills
- •Reading and writing skills
- •Internet access
- •Student status
- •Consent to participate in the study
排除标准
- •Illiteracy
- •Massively limited cognitive abilities ( i.e. linguistic components of the digital offerings must be able to be used, and questionnaires completed, or interviews participated in) and severe psychiatric disorders (e.g., severe depression)
研究组 & 干预措施
students in a community case study
Students at Constructor University Bremen being assessed by means of an online questionnaire in 2025
干预措施: questionnaire (Other)
students in Germany
Students at germany wide being assessed by means of an online questionnaire or qualitative interviews in 2026
干预措施: questionnaire (Other)
结局指标
主要结局
Loneliness
时间窗: Baseline
University of California Los Angelese Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) - 3 Items (Schobin, Arriagada \& Gibson-Kunze, 2024), Range 1 (never/nie) - 5 (very often/sehr oft), higher scores mean a worse outcome Loneliness in private and study context - 9 Items (Techniker Krankenkasse, 2024), Range 1 (often) - 4 (never), higher scores mean better outcomes
Health literacy
时间窗: Baseline
Health literacy - 10 Items (Lenartz, Söllner \& Rudinger, 2014), Range 1 (does not apply/trifft überhaupt nicht zu) - 4 (does fully apply/trifft genau zu), higher scores mean a better outcome
Loneliness
时间窗: 2025 and 2026 (no matching)
University of California Los Angelese Loneliness Scale (UCLA-LS) - 3 Items (Schobin, Arriagada \& Gibson-Kunze, 2024), Range 1 (never/nie) - 5 (very often/sehr oft), higher scores mean a worse outcome Loneliness in private and study context - 9 Items (Techniker Krankenkasse, 2024), Range 1 (often) - 4 (never), higher scores mean better outcomes
Health literacy
时间窗: 2025 and 2026 (no matching)
Health literacy - 10 Items (Lenartz, Söllner \& Rudinger, 2014), Range 1 (does not apply/trifft überhaupt nicht zu) - 4 (does fully apply/trifft genau zu), higher scores mean a better outcome
次要结局
- Depression and anxiety(Baseline)
- Subjective health status(Baseline)
- Student satisfaction(Baseline)
- HEI-Stress(Baseline)
- Depression and anxiety(2025 and 2026 (no matching))
- Subjective health status(2025)
- Student satisfaction(2025 and 2026 (no matching))
- HEI-Stress(2025)
- Subjective health status(2025 and 2026 (no matching))
- HEI-Stress(2025 and 2026 (no matching))
研究者
Prof. Dr. Sonia Lippke
Professor of Health Promotion and Prevention
Jacobs University Bremen gGmbH
