Testing Radon Com Methods: Clinical Trial Smartphone App vs Print Brochures
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 130
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- Using the radon test kit
研究概览
简要总结
The purpose of this research study is to compare the effectiveness of radon information delivered via the radon app vs. a traditional approach (printed brochure). The prevalence of exceptionally high levels of residential radon in ND, coupled with public's poor understanding of this hazard, is a critical public health problem.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- Double (Participant, Investigator)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —（Adult, Older Adult）
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •The principal eligibility criterion is that participants own a smartphone.
排除标准
- •The principal exclusion criterion is previous testing for radon within the past two years.
结局指标
主要结局
Using the radon test kit
时间窗: Through the study completion - 3 months
The rate at which participants use the radon test kit to test their houses
Change from baseline radon knowledge at 3 months
时间窗: Change from baseline knowledge level to the completion of study at 3 months
Participants' knowledge about radon and its dangers, how to protect themselves from radon, etc.
Ordering a free radon test kit
时间窗: Through the study completion - 3 months
The rate at which participants order a free radon test kit
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Soojung Kim
Associate Professor
University of North Dakota