跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT06204276
NCT06204276已完成不适用

The Physiologic Effects of Asymmetrical Versus Conventional High-flow Nasal Cannula in Acute Respiratory Failure. A Randomized Crossover Study.

Siriraj Hospital2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 40 人开始时间: 2024年1月20日最近更新:
适应症
干预措施

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
入组人数
40
试验地点
2
主要终点
Diaphragm thickening fraction

研究概览

简要总结

The goal of this randomized crossover physiological study is to evaluate the physiologic effects of asymmetrical nasal cannula and conventional nasal cannula in patients with acute respiratory failure. The main questions it aims to answer are:

  • Does the asymmetrical high-flow nasal cannula reduce the diaphragm and parasternal intercostal work activity of breathing measured by ultrasound compared to conventional high-flow nasal cannula?
  • What is the effect of the asymmetrical high-flow nasal cannula on breathing pattern, gas exchange, and hemodynamic variables compared to conventional high-flow nasal cannula? Participants will received asymmetrical high-flow nasal cannula or conventional high-flow nasal cannula at a flow rate of 40 and 60 L/min in a random order.

详细描述

High-flow nasal cannula (HFNC) is increasingly used in patients with acute respiratory failure. The physiologic benefits of HFNC can be explained via several mechanisms. These mechanisms lead to improve alveolar ventilation and decrease patient's inspiratory effort directly or indirectly.

Recent clinical practice guidelines recommended to use HFNC in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure over conventional oxygen therapy (COT) and noninvasive ventilation (NIV). A landmark clinical study demonstrated that patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure who received HFNC had better survival than COT and NIV. A systematic review and meta-analysis also demonstrated that HFNC significantly reduced escalation of respiratory support in patients with acute hypoxemic respiratory failure.

HFNC can also be an alternative respiratory support in patients with acute on chronic hypercapnic chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Several physiological and clinical studies in COPD patients with exacerbations have also suggested that HFNC was not inferior to noninvasive ventilation (NIV) in COPD patients with mild to moderate exacerbation, in terms of gas exchange, treatment failure, intubation rate, and mortality rate. It may be also be used during NIV interruptions or after extubation.

Recently, an asymmetrical HFNC interface has been developed with a feature of one prong of smaller diameter and the other prong of larger diameter resulting in an increase in the overall cross-sectional area compared to conventional HFNC interface. An experimental study has shown that asymmetrical nasal cannula potentially increased positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) and enhanced carbon dioxide washout compared to conventional nasal cannula. Different respective effects in terms of pressure, resistance, and dead space washout between the two types of cannulas may explain different results, according to the population.

The aim of this study is to evaluate the physiologic effects of asymmetrical nasal cannula and conventional nasal cannula on diaphragm and parasternal intercostal activity of breathing measured by ultrasound in patients with acute respiratory failure.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
Single (Investigator)

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 90 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with acute hypoxemia respiratory failure
  • Inclusion Criteria:
  • Age > 18 years old
  • Acute respiratory failure within 7 days of hospital admission?
  • Hypoxemia defined by arterial partial pressure of oxygen (PaO2)/FiO2 < 300 mmHg or SpO2/FiO2 < 315
  • Already supported with HFNC device

排除标准

  • Respiratory acidosis: pH < 7.30 and PaCO2 > 45 mmHg
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressor initiation
  • Diminished level of consciousness or uncooperative
  • Active hemoptysis or pneumothorax requiring a chest tube
  • Chronic severe neuromuscular disease
  • Pregnancy
  • Patients with acute hypercapnic COPD Inclusion criteria
  • Age > 40 years old
  • Diagnosed COPD according to the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD) guideline (postbronchodilator forced expiratory volume at 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) < 70%)
  • Exacerbation requiring hospitalization; at least 2 of the following criteria
  • Respiratory rate > 24/min
  • Use of respiratory accessory muscles or paradoxical motion of the abdomen
  • Acute respiratory acidosis with arterial or venous pH < 7.35 and/or PaCO2 > 45 mmHg
  • Exclusion criteria
  • pH < 7.25
  • Hemodynamic instability requiring vasopressor initiation
  • Persistent hypoxemia despite supplemental oxygen therapy
  • Diminished level of consciousness or uncooperative
  • Active hemoptysis or pneumothorax requiring a chest tube
  • Associated severe chronic neuromuscular disease
  • Pregnancy

研究组 & 干预措施

Asymmetrical high-flow nasal cannula

Experimental
  • Asymmetrical nasal cannula (Optiflow+ Duet nasal cannula)
  • Airvo-2 (Fisher&Paykel)

干预措施: Experimental: Asymmetrical high-flow nasal cannula (Device)

Conventional high-flow nasal cannula

Active Comparator
  • Conventional nasal cannula (Optiflow+ nasal cannula)
  • Airvo-2 (Fisher&Paykel)

干预措施: Active comparator: Conventional high-flow nasal cannula (Device)

结局指标

主要结局

Diaphragm thickening fraction

时间窗: 15 minutes

Diaphragm thickening fraction measured by ultrasound

次要结局

  • Parasternal intercostal thickening fraction(15 minutes)
  • Parasternal intercostal/diaphragm thickening fraction ratio(15 minutes)
  • Mean arterial pressure(15 minutes)
  • Transcutaneous carbon dioxide (CO2) pressure(15 minutes)
  • Heart rate(15 minutes)
  • Oxygen saturation(15 minutes)
  • Respiratory rate(15 minutes)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Nuttapol Rittayamai

Associate Professor

Siriraj Hospital

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Asymmetrical Versus Conventional High-flow Nasal... | 临床试验