Moderators of the Effectiveness of Crisis Response Planning (CRP) for Military Personnel
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 进行中(未招募)
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 700
- 试验地点
- 1
- 主要终点
- Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI-R)
研究概览
简要总结
The study is a randomized trial comparing outcomes of active duty service members who present to the emergency department at risk for suicide and receive care from providers trained in crisis response planning versus those providing treatment as usual.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Prevention
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •Active duty service members
- •>18 years old
- •Present to the emergency department at NMCSD with a primary concern related to suicidal ideation, plan, intention, or attempt, or are assessed as being at elevated risk of suicidal behavior
- •Able to understand and speak English
- •Able to provide consent
排除标准
- •Unable to provide informed consent due to impaired mental status (e.g., acute intoxication, psychosis, mania, altered consciousness)
研究组 & 干预措施
Crisis Response Planning
CRP is a brief psychotherapeutic intervention that can be provided to patients at risk of suicidal behavior. When using the intervention, a provider works with the patient (1) to conduct a narrative assessment of the events preceding suicidal thoughts or behavior, and (2) to develop a personalized plan for identifying and managing distress that could escalate to a suicide attempt. The CRP, which is typically handwritten by the patient on an index card, includes personal warning signs of distress, emotion regulation strategies, reasons for living, and contact information for friends/family as well as professional (psychological/medical) and emergency resources.
干预措施: Crisis Response Planning (Behavioral)
Treatment as Usual
Existing clinical practices in the emergency department include the following elements recommended by the VA/DoD Clinical Practice Guidelines: (1) all patients are screened for suicidal ideation at every visit; (2) for those with positive screens, a suicide risk assessment interview is conducted by a mental health professional; (3) a safety planning form with means restriction (such as the Stanley-Brown; Stanley & Brown, 2012) is completed; and (4) patients are referred for follow-up mental health treatment as needed. Other elements of TAU could include behavioral and psychotropic interventions, referrals to specialty mental healthcare, and admission for psychiatric inpatient care.
干预措施: Treatment as Usual (Behavioral)
结局指标
主要结局
Self-Injurious Thoughts and Behaviors Interview (SITBI-R)
时间窗: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Assessment of suicide attempts
Scale for Suicidal Ideation (SSI)
时间窗: Through study completion, an average of 1 year
Assessment of suicidal ideation; 19 items rated on a scale 0-2, higher scores indicate greater suicidal ideation severity
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Kristen Walter
Principal Investigator
United States Naval Medical Center, San Diego
