跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03031314
NCT03031314已完成不适用

Comparison of Knotless Barbed Suture and Standard Suture in Knee Replacement Patients

Washington Hospital Healthcare System0 个研究点目标入组 1,000 人开始时间: 2014年10月1日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
1,000
主要终点
Number of soft tissue infections

研究概览

简要总结

Barbed suture use has been gaining increased acceptance and has been reported to offer potential advantages in wound closure of hip and knee replacement surgeries.

The goal of this study is to compare joint replacement patient outcomes who receive a knotless barbed suture versus a traditional suture (randomized into two arms). The traditional suture used at our joint replacement program is defined as: interrupted sutures to close the retinaculum followed by running monocryl sutures for skin closure. Both knotless barbed suture and the traditional sutures have similar suture size.

Patient outcomes examined will be patient range of motion (recorded daily) and complications with wound healing (evaluated periodically in-person at post-operative visits).

Secondary outcomes examined will include wound drainage on dressings by surface area and weight, as well as the wound cosmesis and perceived presence of subcutaneous surgical knots.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Triple (Participant, Care Provider, Outcomes Assessor)

入排标准

性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • primary joint replacement

排除标准

  • no prior joint surgery
  • no infection

结局指标

主要结局

Number of soft tissue infections

时间窗: 12 weeks

evaluation of wound infection after surgery, number of patients with wound infection based on clinical examination

use of antibiotics to treat infection, recorded by number

时间窗: 12 weeks

record whether antibiotics used for suspicion or treatment of superficial infection, number of episodes recorded

measurement of incision drainage, measured in grams and mm surface area

时间窗: 2 weeks

evaluation of incision drainage based on dressing saturation size and weight, measured in grams for weight, and measured by surface area mm

assessment of quality of incision closure, recorded by time and number

时间窗: 12 weeks

record delayed healing and reported by time, suture rejection based on number of episodes

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Washington Hospital Healthcare System
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Alexander Sah, MD

Physician and Research Chair, Institute for Joint Restoration and Research

Washington Hospital Healthcare System

相似试验