ANALGESIC STRATEGIES FOR ABDOMINAL WALL REPAIR: A RANDOMISED NON INFERIORITY TRIAL OF SIPB, EPIDURAL ANALGESIA, AND PORT INFILTRATION
试验速览
- 阶段
- 4 期
- 状态
- 已完成
- 发起方
- 入组人数
- 160
- 试验地点
- 2
- 主要终点
- postoperative pain management
研究概览
简要总结
Adequate pain control, rehabilitation and early postoperative recovery are currently the model to follow according to the recommended guidelines.In this project the main objective is to evaluate 2 different analgesic strategies, open and laparoscopic surgeries, both intraoperatively and postoperatively, one based on 1. Epidural analgesia and the other 2. Echoguided serratus intercostal block prior to surgical intervention in eventration or abdominal wall repair interventions. or 3 port infiltration and 4 SIPB in laparoscopy We conducted an prospective non inferiority study with a low level of intervention. Epidural analgesia prior to general anesthesia and serratus-intercostal block prior to general anesthesia) following the criteria applied in each case according to the operating room anesthesiologist until reaching the sample size and fulfilling the criteria of: abdominal eventration repair, over 18 years of age, ASA I-III. Signature of the IC. in laparoscopic surgery both techiques are applied after induction of general anaesthesia
详细描述
Adequate pain control, rehabilitation and early postoperative recovery are currently model to follow according to the recommended guidelines.In this project the main objective is to evaluate 2 different analgesic strategies both intraoperatively and postoperatively, one based on 1. Epidural analgesia and the other 2. Echoguided serratus intercostal block prior to surgical intervention in eventration or abdominal wall repair interventions. or 3 port infiltration and 4 SIPB in laparoscopy The investigators conducted an non inferiority study with a low level of intervention. Epidural analgesia , serratus-intercostal block and port infiltration prior to general anesthesia) following the criteria applied in each case according to the operating room anesthesiologist until reaching the sample size and fulfilling the criteria of: abdominal eventration repair, over 18 years of age, ASA I-III. Signature of the IC.
We will assess the analgesia provided by the techniques in both techniques and to compare the results.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Sequential
- 主要目的
- Treatment
- 盲法
- Single (Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 18 Years 至 85 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
- 性别
- All
- 接受健康志愿者
- 否
入选标准
- •abdominal eventration repair,
- •over 18 years old,
- •ASA I-III.
- •Signature of the IC.
排除标准
- •Allergy to Local anesthetic
研究组 & 干预措施
Patient under serratus intercostal plane block
patients who will undergo a modified bilateral ultrasound-guided BRILMA block (SIPB) using a high-frequency linear probe (6-15 Hz) and 80 mm needle.
干预措施: undergo (Procedure)
Patient under serratus intercostal plane block
patients who will undergo a modified bilateral ultrasound-guided BRILMA block (SIPB) using a high-frequency linear probe (6-15 Hz) and 80 mm needle.
干预措施: ultrasound (Device)
Patient under serratus intercostal plane block
patients who will undergo a modified bilateral ultrasound-guided BRILMA block (SIPB) using a high-frequency linear probe (6-15 Hz) and 80 mm needle.
干预措施: Local anesthetic (Drug)
patient under epidural analgesia
patients who undergo Epidural Analgesia prior to General Anesthesia and fentanyl 1 mcg/kg approx according to characteristics and needs and upon arrival at the URPA is connected to the PC Levobupi 0.125% at 6 ml / h + rescue boluses of Levobupi 0.125% 4 ml if needed in the 1st hours.
干预措施: undergo (Procedure)
patient under epidural analgesia
patients who undergo Epidural Analgesia prior to General Anesthesia and fentanyl 1 mcg/kg approx according to characteristics and needs and upon arrival at the URPA is connected to the PC Levobupi 0.125% at 6 ml / h + rescue boluses of Levobupi 0.125% 4 ml if needed in the 1st hours.
干预措施: Local anesthetic (Drug)
结局指标
主要结局
postoperative pain management
时间窗: 24h
Pain control. NRS scale at O,6, 12 and 24 h in postoperative time
postoperative quality of recovery
时间窗: 24h
Quality of recovery, QoR15 scale, that includes physical and psicological item. That scale will be fill by the patient 24 h after surgery
次要结局
未报告次要终点
研究者
Judith Andres
MD
Hospital del Rio Hortega
