跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03785015
NCT03785015Unknown不适用

When Should Low-dose Aspirin be Resumed After Peptic Ulcer Bleeding? A Randomized Controlled Trial

Chinese University of Hong Kong1 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 436 人开始时间: 2019年1月14日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
入组人数
436
试验地点
1
主要终点
Recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding

研究概览

简要总结

Acute upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding associated with the use of low-dose aspirin (ASA) is a major cause of peptic ulcer bleeding worldwide. Among survivors of acute myocardial infarction, a study of over 14,000 patients reported that the risk of life-threatening GI bleeding in the first two months is 7 times higher than that in the subsequent months. After endoscopic control of ulcer bleeding, most patients with cardiovascular (CV) diseases will need to resume ASA. However, the investigator found that immediate resumption of ASA saves life but at the expense of higher risk of recurrent bleeding. Peptic ulcer bleeding associated with ASA is a major cause of hospitalization in Hong Kong. Currently, ASA use has contributed to about one-third of the bleeding ulcers admitted to our hospital that serves a local population of 1.5 million. Accordingly, current international guidelines recommend early resumption of ASA but the optimal timing is unknown. Clinicians often face the dilemma: when should ASA be resumed? Furthermore, patients who suffer from acute peptic ulcer bleeding are often elderly patients with significant co-morbidities. Mortality in these patients remains high. Clinicians are facing an increasing number of patients who are on antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants. The investigator proposes a open-label randomized-controlled trial to evaluate the optimal timing of resuming ASA in patients with CV diseases complicated by peptic ulcer bleeding. Patients will be randomized to resume the standard treatment within first few hours or only to resume the standard treatment 72 hours after endoscopic haemostasis.

详细描述

Acute upper gastrointestinal (GI) bleeding associated with the use of low-dose aspirin (ASA) is a major cause of peptic ulcer bleeding worldwide. Among survivors of acute myocardial infarction, a study of over 14,000 patients reported that the risk of life-threatening GI bleeding in the first two months is 7 times higher than that in the subsequent months (1). After endoscopic control of ulcer bleeding, most patients with cardiovascular (CV) diseases will need to resume ASA. Clinicians often face the dilemma: when should ASA be resumed? Furthermore, patients who suffer from acute peptic ulcer bleeding are often elderly patients with significant co-morbidities. Mortality in these patients remains high. Clinicians are facing an increasing number of patients who are on antiplatelet drugs or anticoagulants.

However, there are very limited data to guide the best timing for resumption of ASA in these high risk patients. To date, our group has conducted the only randomized controlled trial in the literature that has partially addressed this issue. Importantly, the investigator found that immediate resumption of ASA saves life but at the expense of higher risk of recurrent bleeding (2). Accordingly, current international guidelines recommend early resumption of ASA but the optimal timing is unknown.

In the setting of acute GI bleeding, it is often a dilemma whether to stop or to restart these drugs. The balance between bleeding and thrombotic risks is difficult and treatment is often empirical and not evidence-based.

The investigator aims to test the hypothesis that in ASA users complicated by peptic ulcer bleeding, withholding ASA till day 3 reduces the risk of recurrent bleeding compared to immediate resumption of ASA without a significant increase in mortality.

References

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Prevention
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients with actively bleeding gastroduodenal lesions (peptic ulcer, bleeding erosions, or Dieulafoy's lesion) or ulcers showing other high risk stigmata (visible blood vessels or adherent clots) treated by endoscopic therapy
  • Subjects continue to require regular ASA or dual anti-platelet therapy for treatment of CV or cerebrovascular diseases after this bleeding episode

排除标准

  • Patients who received ASA for primary prophylaxis
  • Unsuccessful endoscopic hemostasis of bleeding ulcers or ulcer perforation
  • Gastric outlet obstruction
  • Known sensitivity to PPIs
  • Previous partial gastrectomy or vagotomy
  • Patients need concomitant anticoagulant
  • Pregnant unless sterilization, menopause or last menstrual period within 7 days
  • Other co-morbidities or advanced age that will hinder the drug compliance or follow up
  • Malignancy on active treatment
  • Unable to give consent

结局指标

主要结局

Recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding

时间窗: 30 days after endoscopic treatment

Recurrent peptic ulcer bleeding within 30 days of endoscopic treatment

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Siew Chien NG

Professor

Chinese University of Hong Kong

研究点 (1)

Loading locations...

相似试验