跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03372031
NCT03372031已完成不适用

Active Versus Passive Piano Intervention for Dexterity in Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Westminster College2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 20 人开始时间: 2017年8月30日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
已完成
发起方
入组人数
20
试验地点
2
主要终点
Purdue Pegboard

研究概览

简要总结

Does active piano practice help recover hand dexterity in older adults, or does social interaction and music-listening alone affect motor performance? Researchers hypothesized improved dexterity after active piano playing, but not after passive piano listening. 15 residents of a retirement community were partnered together and completed 2 two-week piano training modules. In module 1, one partner played piano exercises and songs while the other listened. In module 2, partners switched roles. The Purdue Pegboard Test and Box and Block Test assessed fine and gross motor dexterity, before, between, and after the training modules. A repeated measures ANOVA showed a main effect of time on overall fine and gross motor function, but there was no main effect of playing versus listening. Results did not support the hypothesis, but indicate that piano-based therapy requires greater than 2 weeks to begin improving dexterity and may influenced co-occurring socialization.

详细描述

The primary finding of this study is that older adults demonstrate improvements in manual dexterity after four weeks of piano training, but do not improve significantly after just two weeks. Furthermore, it does not matter whether the participants actively play for the first part and passively listen for the second part or vice versa.

Of the three proposed mechanisms of Music Supported Therapy (MST) explained in the introduction, the findings of this study may be best explained by the emotion-motivation mechanism. Though dexterity scores were organized by whether the scores followed an active playing module, all participants experienced the same amount of music-listening and social interaction. Whether the participant was playing the music him/herself or observing, both groups were always hearing the same songs and scales for the same amount of time. The emotion-motivation mechanism states that this music-listening alone may increase cognitive processes like working memory and boost both mood and motivation. Therefore, these findings may mean that listening to piano music helps dexterity performance in older adults; but it does so if and only if the participants experience the music-listening module for a sufficient duration of time.

Along with music-listening, social interaction was consistent between active and passive groups throughout the study. This interpersonal interaction may also have had an effect on mood and motivation, as piano instructors provided high levels of encouragement and complimented the participants' progress often. Relationship quality between patient and therapist is correlated with efficacy of therapy. This concept of increased socialization contributing to dexterity improvements is also supported by a study that identified social participation as a preventative factor of perceptual speed decline in older adults.

Not finding the hypothesized effect of active versus passive condition on dexterity could be due to dexterous activities that the participants were engaged in outside of the training modules. For example, three of the 15 participants reported that they currently play piano in their free time, so it can be conjectured that those participants were engaged in active piano playing even when they were in the passive listening module. Other activities enjoyed by participants include exercise classes and painting-both of which could have been improving or maintaining their dexterity throughout the study.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Crossover
主要目的
Treatment
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
70 Years 至 —(Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Able to physically and cognitively withstand 30 minute piano training sessions

排除标准

  • 未提供

结局指标

主要结局

Purdue Pegboard

时间窗: 10 minutes

Fine Motor Manual Dexterity

Box and Block Test

时间窗: 5 minutes

Gross Motor Dexterity

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

发起方
Westminster College
申办方类型
Other
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验