跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT03617146
NCT03617146终止不适用

Coaching and Education for Diabetes Distress: a Randomized Controlled Trial (CEDD Trial)

Baylor College of Medicine2 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 19 人开始时间: 2018年6月15日最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
19
试验地点
2
主要终点
Diabetes distress score

研究概览

简要总结

Diabetes distress (DD) is a negative emotional reaction to a diagnosis of diabetes and concerns about the burden of managing diabetes, the risk of complications, and inadequate support system. DD is common among people with diabetes and is strongly associated with poor diabetes self-care and poor diabetes control. Reducing DD should thus be an important component of diabetes management. In line with the growing evidence, the American Diabetes Association now recommends that providers "routinely monitor people with diabetes for diabetes distress, particularly when treatment targets are not met". Despite increased recognition of the need to manage DD, interventions that are both feasible and effective for reducing DD in routine care settings are not yet known. A pilot study showed that health coaching (HC) has some efficacy in addressing DD but no adequately powered study has implemented a pragmatic research design capable of assessing the real-world effectiveness of HC in reducing DD.

This study seeks to assess whether HC effectively reduces DD among primary care patients with diabetes, and whether HC is more effective than an educational program targeting DD. The investigators hypothesize that over a 6-month period, patients with poorly controlled diabetes and DD who enroll in and complete at least five HC sessions will achieve higher and clinically significant reductions in DD and HbA1c, and greater compliance with diabetes self-care recommendations than those who receive only an educational program targeting DD as part of usual diabetes care.

The two-arm randomized controlled trial for patients with poorly-controlled diabetes is taking place at an academic family medicine practice in Houston, Texas. Both arms will receive usual care, which includes education about DD. In addition, the intervention arm will receive eight HC sessions over a five-month period. The primary outcome measure is reduction in DD over a six month period. Additional outcome measures include changes in glycemic control (HbA1C) and self-care practices (medication adherence, dietary, and physical activity behaviors). The study will also measure satisfaction and willingness-to-pay for HC to determine the extent to which HC, if effective for reducing DD, can be operationalized in similar healthcare settings.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
主要目的
Supportive Care
盲法
Single (Outcomes Assessor)

盲法说明

Due to the nature of the behavioral intervention, neither participants nor clinic staff can be blinded to allocation. However, to avoid bias in assessing outcomes, the analyst who will abstract the outcomes data from the electronic health record will not have access to information about the allocation. Hence retrieval of data on baseline and follow up diabetes distress scores, HbA1c, and diabetes self-management behaviors, and the creation of the analysis dataset will be done without knowledge or consideration of allocation status.

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 75 Years(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Has had a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes for at least 6 months
  • Aged 18 to 75 years
  • Most recent HbA1c taken within 30 days was ≥ 8.0
  • At least moderate diabetes distress (a mean score ≥ 2.0 on the 17-item Diabetes Distress Scale).

排除标准

  • Moderately-severe to severe depression: Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ9) score ≥15
  • Other severe mental health disorder (e.g. Alzheimer's, schizophrenia)
  • Current pregnancy
  • Severe diabetes complications or functional deficits (e.g. kidney failure requiring dialysis, amputation, blindness).

结局指标

主要结局

Diabetes distress score

时间窗: 3 months and 6 months from baseline

Change in diabetes distress score as measured by the diabetes distress scale (DDS). DDS scores range from 1 to 6, with scores that are less than 2.0 being indicative of little or no distress. Hence scores of 2.0 and above are significant and higher values are indicative of worse outcome.

次要结局

  • HbA1c(3 months and 6 months from baseline)
  • Self-care behaviors (medication adherence, dietary practices, and physical activity behaviors)(3 months and 6 months from baseline)

研究者

申办方类型
Other
责任方
Principal Investigator
主要研究者

Charles C Chima

Adjunct Assistant Professor

Baylor College of Medicine

研究点 (2)

Loading locations...

相似试验

Coaching and Education for Diabetes Distress | 临床试验