跳至主要内容
临床试验/NCT00619151
NCT00619151终止不适用

A Randomized Study to Compare Sizing, Implant Techniques, & Hemodynamic Performance Between the CarboMedics Supra-annular Top Hat Valve and the St. Jude Medical Regent Valve in the Aortic Position.

Sorin Group USA, Inc.4 个研究点 分布在 1 个国家目标入组 2 人开始时间: 2007年12月最近更新:
适应症

试验速览

阶段
不适用
状态
终止
入组人数
2
试验地点
4
主要终点
Effective Orifice Area (EOA)

研究概览

简要总结

The purpose of this study is to compare the sizing and implant techniques between the CarboMedics Top Hat supra-annular valve and the St. Jude Medical Regent valve.

研究设计

研究类型
Interventional
分配方式
Randomized
干预模型
Parallel
盲法
None

入排标准

年龄范围
18 Years 至 —(Adult, Older Adult)
性别
All
接受健康志愿者

入选标准

  • Patients who are indicated for implant with a mechanical valve prosthesis in the aortic position according to the current practice for valve selection at the center.

排除标准

  • Patients < 18 years of age
  • Emergency surgery
  • Pre-existing valve prosthesis
  • Aortic root replacement
  • Active endocarditis

结局指标

主要结局

Effective Orifice Area (EOA)

时间窗: 6 month evaluation

Effective Orifice Area of the prosthetic valve measured via echocardiography to determine physiological area of blood flow through the valve.

Aortic Mean Gradient

时间窗: 6 months

Mean gradient measured across the aortic prosthetic valve via echocardiography to determine mean pressure of blood flow across the valve.

次要结局

未报告次要终点

研究者

申办方类型
Industry
责任方
Sponsor

研究点 (4)

Loading locations...

相似试验

CarboMedics Top Hat vs St. Jude Medical Regent Valve... | 临床试验