Double Lock Versus Continuous Non-locking Technique for Closure of Rectus Sheath in Cesarean Sections on Post-operative Pain
试验速览
- 阶段
- 不适用
- 状态
- 已完成
- 入组人数
- 150
- 主要终点
- postoperative pain evaluated by VAS
研究概览
简要总结
In this trial we compare the effect of 2 closure techniques of the rectus sheath during cesarean sections on postoperative pain. One closure technique is double lock technique and the other is the conventional continuous non-locking technique.
研究设计
- 研究类型
- Interventional
- 分配方式
- Randomized
- 干预模型
- Parallel
- 主要目的
- Supportive Care
- 盲法
- Quadruple (Participant, Care Provider, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
入排标准
- 年龄范围
- 20 Years 至 40 Years（Adult）
- 性别
- Female
- 接受健康志愿者
- 是
入选标准
- •first cesarean section
排除标准
- •urgent cesarean section
- •previous abdominal surgery
- •previous cesarean section
- •obstetric and medical complications
研究组 & 干预措施
group a
This arm will have lower segment cesarean section done with double locking technique for closure of Rectus Sheath.
干预措施: lower segment cesarean section and double lock closure of rectus sheath (Procedure)
group b
This arm will have lower segment cesarean section done with continuous non-locking technique for closure of rectus sheath.
干预措施: lower segment cesarean section and continuous non-locking closure of rectus sheath (Procedure)
结局指标
主要结局
postoperative pain evaluated by VAS
时间窗: first week postoperative
次要结局
- operative time(intraoperative)
研究者
dr mohammed elsafty
Associate Professor
Ain Shams Maternity Hospital